Re: Public Enemy No. 1: The Council on Foreign Relations



On Wed, 23 May 2007 20:27:40 -0400, "Francis A. Miniter"
<miniter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Howard Duck wrote:

http://www.powerofprophecy.com/without_bang_or_whimper.htm


Howard,

As much as I hate Bush and think he is an arrogant idiot, still this article is
highly unfair to him and to the U.S. Government.

OK, here we go again, Francis. I see I'm going to have to wade
through your statements, ignoring the asides claiming what idiots we
all are.

Notice this interview from Lou Dobbs on CNN, 2006:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/Lou_Dobbs_transcript.html


Besides an incredible mixed metaphor linking Zionists to Mexicans and Canadians
(this might make a good Mel Brooks film), the article has many, many facts just
plain wrong.

This was not a mixed metaphor. What is being said here is that The
Council on Foreign Relations is behind the move toward weakening our
border control, and that the CFR is over 70% Jewish.

It is my understanding that there are over 21 million illegal aliens
living or working in the US at this time (estimated numbers vary). Is
that not correct?

Let's just focus on the Security and Prosperity Partnership. The article
alleges an agreement was signed in 2005 "specifying terms of surrender and
American occupation by foreign powers". Neat, Howard. Produce the document.
Nothing of the sort occurred. See http://www.spp.gov/myths_vs_facts.asp

"Myth: The SPP was an agreement signed by Presidents Bush and his Mexican and
Canadian counterparts in Waco, TX, on March 23, 2005.

"Fact: The SPP is a dialogue to increase security and enhance prosperity among
the three countries. The SPP is not an agreement nor is it a treaty. In fact,
no agreement was ever signed."

Howard, here are all the SPP documents. http://www.spp.gov/links.asp Show me a
surrender.

Yes, but read the interview I referenced above. What the government
says and what it does are two different things.

What you have to realize, Howard, is that the people who write such trash are
paranoid schizos who have hate focused on foreigners, with special groups picked
out as targets.

This is an unfair assessment of the people I have quoted. These do
not hate foreigners, they abhor the destruction of our Constitution.

If you want to give me your solid assurance that there will be no new
currency intended for trade throughout North America, and that it will
not eventually replace the US dollar (since the dollar is losing its
value rapidly with no likelihood of recovery), then I will make a note
of it, and you will please issue an open apology if you should prove
to be wrong (again).

Francis A. Miniter
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Y&R The things I liked and disliked
    ... Except I'm starting to hate Adam. ... will devastate Nikki and Victor will probably gloat and show no ... I think she's a total breath of fresh air. ... Total agreement. ...
    (rec.arts.tv.soaps.cbs)
  • Re: OT - Innocent men held as Guantanamo Bay prisoners
    ... until a foreign power invaded. ... > insurgents are mostly Islamic fundamentalists who hate all infidels, ... > Sunis who hate Shiites, Shiites who hate Sunis, Baathists who miss ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT - Innocent men held as Guantanamo Bay prisoners
    ... until a foreign power invaded. ... Sunis who hate Shiites, Shiites who hate Sunis, Baathists who miss ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Palestinians Under Attack
    ... that was more appealing to them than their native country. ... World who seem to hate the US precisely BECAUSE we have wealth, ... freedom, safety, protections from despots, job and education ... Al Qaeda was formed in 1988 in protest to foreign intervention in the ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: OT: And Palin is a dunce?
    ... Every agreement Israel has made with the ... the UN (altho they hate to admit it), the MSM, (altho they hate to ... admit it), liberal kool-aid drinkers. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)