Re: Trial delays: discovery? Usual thing?
- From: lynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lynn allen)
- Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 18:03:36 -0700
Don Harstad <dharstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We had one fellow who had been taped during a burglary, and had been
arrested on premises at three am when we were responding to the silent
alarm. I referred to him as the perpetrator during a pre-trail hearing, and
his attorney had a fit. His client immediately stated, "But I _am_ guilty.
They caught me in the f----ng act, already." Nonetheless, had we been in
front of the jury, I would have made more of an effort to refer to the
"accused." I thought of it more as a matter of good manners.
Ha! Once I was on a jury where the defendant had been witnessed by
police officers on stakeout, stealing hubcaps. He ran, and was captured
when he turned down a dead-end street.
The *ONLY* defense his lawyer could come up with was that the charge of
"Larceny over $500" was incorrect, because what he stole was worth less.
Unfortunately for his case, his client stole a set of Cadillac wheel
covers. The nice wire ones. No way those go for less than $500, even
years ago.
Also unfortunately, we found out later that was the guy's third felony,
and under Michigan's 3-strikes law, he was going away for a long time.
For stealing hubcaps. That was why the desperate defense. I felt
rather bad, because none of his felonies were against persons, or
violent, but that was the law at the time, and the $500 amount made it a
felony instead of a misdemeanor.
When the lawyers came back to the jury room, and the defense guy asked
what he could have done better, the only response I could give him was
"get a better client!" He looked rueful and told me he'd been
appointed.
That guy was guilty from the word go, and it was written all over him.
Along with "Loser." I felt worst for his parents, who were in the
courtroom for the whole thing.
Lymaree
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Trial delays: discovery? Usual thing?
- From: Pogonip
- Re: Trial delays: discovery? Usual thing?
- References:
- Trial delays: discovery? Usual thing?
- From: J K
- Re: Trial delays: discovery? Usual thing?
- From: Chris F.A. Johnson
- Re: Trial delays: discovery? Usual thing?
- From: Don Harstad
- Trial delays: discovery? Usual thing?
- Prev by Date: Re: SOT: b'con panels
- Next by Date: Re: What Happened to the Authors?
- Previous by thread: Re: Trial delays: discovery? Usual thing?
- Next by thread: Re: Trial delays: discovery? Usual thing?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|