Re: OT: Intelligent Falling
- From: "Mary" <mrfeathers@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Dec 2005 15:08:55 -0800
Since we're poking fun at ID, I'll post this -- it's evidently making
the rounds on Usenet and anyone who's a fan of Monty Python and not a
fan of ID should enjoy it.
Customer: Hello. I wish to complain about this so-called 'scientific
theory' what I purchased not half an hour ago from this very
establishment.
Salesman: Oh yes, 'Intelligent Design'. What, uh... what's wrong
with it?
Customer: I'll tell you what's wrong with it, my lad. Its vacuous,
that's what's wrong with it!
Salesman: No, no, uh... what we need now is to 'teach the
controversy'...
Customer: Look matey, I know an empty 'argument from incredulity'
when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now.
Salesman: No, no, it's not empty: it's just being elaborated.
Remarkable theory, 'Intelligent Design', innit, eh? I mean, just
look at all these books and articles: millions and millions of
words...!
Customer: The verbiage don't enter into it, my lad. It's stone dead.
It's a non-starter. Empirically untestable, it belongs in
metaphysics. This 'theory' makes no predictions; has no contribution
to make
beyond extended polemics; and can't even be honest about who it
thinks the 'Designer' was.
Bereft of all logical and epistemological credibility, it has no
scientific status! If certain right-wing and fundamentalist
pressure-groups hadn't hit upon it as a way of opposing decades of
uncomfortable scientific and social progress, it'd be pushing up
daisies! It's off the table. It's kicked the waste-paper bucket.
THIS IS A NON-THEORY!
Salesman: Well, I'd better replace it then. [takes a quick peek
around] Sorry, squire: looks like that's all we've got...
Customer: I see, I see. I get the picture.
Salesman: I've got a piece of coal that looks quite a bit like a
human tibia, if you squint at it...
Customer: Pray, is it part of a theory that unifies the
paleontological and biological sciences and leads to a powerful
understanding of observed homologies and the nested hierarchy of
life?
Salesman: Not really.
Customer: WELL IT'S HARDLY A BLOODY REPLACEMENT FOR DARWINISM THEN,
IS IT?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Intelligent Falling
- From: Annie C
- Re: OT: Intelligent Falling
- References:
- OT: Intelligent Falling
- From: Jr@Ease
- OT: Intelligent Falling
- Prev by Date: Re: O.T.Tookies Night Before Christmas
- Next by Date: Re: WWWOT: LCD or Plasma
- Previous by thread: OT: Intelligent Falling
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Intelligent Falling
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|