Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- From: CineSIght <CineSight@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
On May 7, 12:06 pm, Martin Hart <emai...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article <6b4716e9-56f1-4f5e-8f12-78b0b719acf1
@k9g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, CineSi...@xxxxxxxxx says...
On May 7, 8:10 am, Patty Winter <pat...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <27955446-6d6b-4b5c-a637-7a046f14b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
CineSIght <CineSi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 7, 7:04 am, Steve Kraus <scr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Interesting but no reason to post it 3 times.
it's only posted once. where do you see it posted 3 times?
Message-ID: <698c538b-074a-44f8-b235-ac578cf2f...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <0846e430-5b09-4e06-ad24-47fec5f3f...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <733036d1-d5c4-4e90-bb91-59313570d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I am posting through Google Groups, which offers a remove option, and
I used it a couple times to re-edit the first post and work out some
formatting issues. And each time it was removed in under a couple
minutes. On MY Google Groups RAMT page, right now, that message is
only posted ONCE. I can't control what happens on all the different
readers other people are using. That's the problem with the nearly-
extinct, spam infested old Usenet.
As I've mentioned before, I have a cinema tech forum set up on my own
site that's very versatile, easy to read, and 100% spam-free,
http://cinemasightlines.com/csmb/index.phpbut RAMTers prefer to slog
through all the incompatible complications and spamming here.
There's nothing wrong with Usenet and R.A.M.T. gets damned little spam.
Don't blame Usenet for Google Newsgroups problems. A hell of a lot more
people read this group from a direct newsfeed than through Google or
AOL.
From where I sit RAMT is about 75% spam. Does Usenet allow people toedit their own post, attach photos, or block spam entirely like
today's latest forum programs?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- From: Scott Dorsey
- Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- From: Scott Norwood
- Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- References:
- STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- From: CineSIght
- Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- From: CineSIght
- Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- From: Steve Kraus
- Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- From: CineSIght
- Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- From: Patty Winter
- Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- From: CineSIght
- Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- From: Martin Hart
- STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- Prev by Date: Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- Next by Date: Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- Previous by thread: Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- Next by thread: Re: STAR TREK in Imax... from a total non-fan (slight conceptual spoilers?)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|