Re: Zodiac: shot with Viper FilmStream cameras in uncompressed HD
- From: snorwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Scott Norwood)
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:26:53 +0000 (UTC)
In article <F6SLh.1653$Sf2.284@trnddc01>,
Randall Coleman <res197va@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
What
about 300? Was that shot on video?
No, it was shot on film and still looked really crappy. (Am I the only one
who truly hated this film? It keeps getting good reviews and I don't know
why.)
--
Scott Norwood: snorwood@xxxxxxx, snorwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cool Home Page: http://www.redballoon.net/
Lame Quote: Penguins? In Snack Canyon?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Zodiac: shot with Viper FilmStream cameras in uncompressed HD
- From: mrthreed@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Zodiac: shot with Viper FilmStream cameras in uncompressed HD
- From: Jim Nason
- Re: Zodiac: shot with Viper FilmStream cameras in uncompressed HD
- From: Randall Coleman
- Zodiac: shot with Viper FilmStream cameras in uncompressed HD
- Prev by Date: Re: Zodiac: shot with Viper FilmStream cameras in uncompressed HD
- Next by Date: Re: Zodiac: shot with Viper FilmStream cameras in uncompressed HD
- Previous by thread: Re: Zodiac: shot with Viper FilmStream cameras in uncompressed HD
- Next by thread: Re: Zodiac: shot with Viper FilmStream cameras in uncompressed HD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|