Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- From: "G. John Garrett, C.A.S" <jg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:03:06 -0400
Noah Timan wrote:
Thanks, Billy, for posting your thoughts -- it's appreciated. As you
are well aware, there is a marked difference between latent potential
for repair in post and actual repair being regularly done along the
lines of the prescribed notion put forth by a new production mixing
practice or piece of gear. There are lots of bells and whistles that
we've had exposure to over the years that would, in theory, cure all
our ills. Combine them with a smart dialog editor and a generous
helping of time and you could cull a combination from our isos and mono
mixes that would sound like a million bucks.
Typically I imagine the editor would only need a few words here and there, something they often do already with a mix track and ISOs.
But the problem is that we can't just turn over our tracks to someone
with a general time code reference and assume that they will work it
all out.
No, post has to be on board before you shoot. Workflow meetings have to take place. When everybody understands how things go, then you have a chance to make it work.
I understand that the Zaxcom radios have a recording feature
that other radios don't have, and I'm not trying to knock that feature
-- or the radios. I think both are beneficial. But I do have some
issues with the notion that the radios present a solution to
disappearing RF bandwidth if that solution is "well, we record
everything on the actors' transmitters, and post works it all out
later." If that happens, great, we'll all buy Zaxcom radios. But
it's not quite a safe assumption that this is going to be accepted by
post or anyone else yet.
In the end its still probably cheaper than ADR, and saves an ADR session at the least, and will make some impossible situations possible. Its not just that the post budgets are shrinking either, production seems to want us to yank increasingly larger rabbits out of our hats.
I've had enough trouble in my life trying to
get post to deal with two legs of a DAT -- now they're gonna have time
to reassemble a timeline from six to eight different bwf-m files on
their ever-shrinking schedules? I am happy to be wrong, but as of now
I'm skeptical. I believe they'll go back to making room for the
boom before they will accept not being able to hear the take properly
on the day and have to patch it together from multiple files just to
make dailies.
....
You can adjust the transmitter gain stage, sure, but are you going to
be able to do that effectively via an IFB remote while you're mixing
a broken-up, hit-filled scratch mix?
Well sure, you do this on the rehearsal, just like setting up the gain stages in your mixer.
Again, I'm not saying the Zaxcom unit is a bad product, just that we
shouldn't yet consider it a practical solution to the very concerning
problem of disappearing bandwidth or actively encourage people who
don't know better to spend thousands on it because it's going to be
the radio that survives the re-occupation of the airwaves.
Why not? Got a better radio solution?
My .02
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- From: Noah Timan
- Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- References:
- Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- From: Billy Sarokin
- Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- From: Ty Ford
- Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- From: Billy Sarokin
- Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- From: Billy Sarokin
- Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- From: adhocsound
- Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- From: Billy Sarokin
- Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- From: Noah Timan
- Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- From: Billy Sarokin
- Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- From: Noah Timan
- Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- Prev by Date: Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- Next by Date: Re: Great antennas
- Previous by thread: Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- Next by thread: Re: Zaxcom recording radios... another shameless rave
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|