Re: 744T RF Woes
- From: "Charles Tomaras" <tomaras@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:18:41 -0700
"johngooch" <jgoochmixer@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1145285776.582148.117090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Charlie,
Well, i took my stab in the dark. I guess DC is not the issue. Do you
notice the problem with only the 400 units?
I don't own any 400 units, I'm all 205's in Block 22 coming into my bag (4
systems). Block 22 exacerbates the situation in Seattle because two third of
the block taken up by local broadcasting. So I'm limited to 1/3 of Block 22
and all of the numerous RF emissions and spikes from the 744t. Makes it very
difficult to get 4 useable frequencies to work together. I always have some
base level of RF to deal with (2 or 3 rf lights on the 205's) in the best of
circumstances with the 744t powered up. My range has been cut down
significantly by this and I'm much more prone to taking RF hits.
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 744T RF Woes
- From: Audio1979
- Re: 744T RF Woes
- From: Audio1979
- Re: 744T RF Woes
- References:
- Re: 744T RF Woes
- From: John Blankenship
- Re: 744T RF Woes
- From: Eric Toline
- Re: 744T RF Woes
- From: Scott Farr
- Re: 744T RF Woes
- From: Charles Tomaras
- Re: 744T RF Woes
- From: acmesound
- Re: 744T RF Woes
- From: johngooch
- Re: 744T RF Woes
- From: Charles Tomaras
- Re: 744T RF Woes
- From: johngooch
- Re: 744T RF Woes
- Prev by Date: Re: 744T RF Woes
- Next by Date: Re: 744T RF Woes
- Previous by thread: Re: 744T RF Woes
- Next by thread: Re: 744T RF Woes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|