Re: Non-Linear .bwf sound file naming


Re: Non-Linear .bwf sound file naming

Group: rec.arts.movies.production.sound Date: Fri, Dec 30, 2005, 11:14am
(EST-3) From: spamiser@xxxxxxxxx (Philip Perkins)

Wasn't the old British system that of giving every sync take a unique
number, that was keyed to the script super's log book? That would
certainly be simpler for a long show being recorded non-linear than
entering a lot of scene/take info, which, as we know, is wrong a good
percentage of the time.
Philip Perkins<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Isn't that like the NY style of having consecutive take numbers
regardless of the scene number? That way there's only one take one, etc?

An alternate system I ran across was scene & take numbers as usual but
with consecutive track numbers.

One set of master numbers does make things easier.

Eric

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Non-Linear .bwf sound file naming
    ... That was the way to slate when I was coming up in NYC. ... Wasn't the old British system that of giving every sync take a unique ... regardless of the scene number? ... with consecutive track numbers. ...
    (rec.arts.movies.production.sound)
  • Re: Non-Linear .bwf sound file naming
    ... > Wasn't the old British system that of giving every sync take a unique ... Each setup gets an accumulating number. ... We do add scene numbers, so it may become scene 23a slate 5 ...
    (rec.arts.movies.production.sound)