Re: Japan changes name of Iwo Jima

In article <f5ekik$bqb$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Juan F. Lara
<ljuan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <1182431746.919947.50840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Calvin <crice5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It should never have been returned to Japan.

What? Why not?

That's what we get for being nice. Damn the Japan of World War II; here it
is raising it's ugly head again.

What the Hell are you talking about?

Nationalism is rising a bit over there, quite understandably (North
Korea firing missiles over Japan without the US doing anything woke
them up a bit). However, this name thing isn't a symptom of it :)

--
Chris Mack "Refugee, total ***. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
-'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
.

Loading