Re: O'Reilly on Letterman
- From: "natch" <jmpc@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Jan 2006 08:56:17 -0800
Calvin Rice wrote:
> What makes me cringe, and embarrassed for Letterman, is
> that he is not above saying something that he knows he doesn't
> have to back up, because the audience will cheer whatever he says.
> He said that 60 percent of what O'Reilly says is crap, and the
> audience yelled its approval, while O'Reilly had to sit there and take
> it, as if Letterman had scored a point. There were several moments
> like that, and those moments are very much like college audiences
> shouting down a speaker. If this is what lefties think is meaningful
> debate, then their view is beneath contempt.
>
> O'Reilly is far from perfect, but that's not the point. Simply saying,
> 'You suck', and getting a cheer from the choir, shouldn't impress
> anyone over four years old. Make that three years.
>
> -cr
calvin, calvin, the loudest appluase by a long shot is when letterman
said "support the troops" Nothing was even a close second. Despite your
rantings about lefty this and lefty that it is still this knee jerk
love for war that gets the most arousal out of everyone. yeah, yeah I
know, no matter how you feel about this war or war in general you have
to have a great deal of respect for men and women who put their lives
on the line for whatever reason and they deserve cheers, but that said
it is ironic how you hear what you want and ignore what you want. Also
OReilly had every opportunity to defend himself, give us a break
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: O'Reilly on Letterman
- From: Calvin Rice
- Re: O'Reilly on Letterman
- References:
- O'Reilly on Letterman
- From: Calvin Rice
- O'Reilly on Letterman
- Prev by Date: Crash (2006) - overrated
- Next by Date: Re: Crash (2006) - overrated
- Previous by thread: Re: O'Reilly on Letterman
- Next by thread: Re: O'Reilly on Letterman
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|