Re: Totally OT...

On Sep 25, 10:50 pm, Sis <siste...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ns787980 wrote:
On Sep 20, 2:08 am, Sis <siste...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ns787980 wrote:
On Sep 16, 7:26 pm, Sis <siste...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David White wrote:
Sis wrote:
ns787980 wrote:
On Sep 12, 11:26 pm, Sis <siste...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ns787980 wrote:
On Sep 6, 2:09 am, Sis <siste...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ns787980 wrote:
On Sep 6, 12:19 am, Sis <siste...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gary Duguay wrote:
The funny thing is that I was starting to like Obama.
In the early days of campaining he talked about sitting down
and taling with Iran and trying to open up relations with them .
Now he is talking tuff and poking a stick at them for no good
reason
just like the republicans. It seems like the same old sh!t.
They both are
trying to turn Iran into the next boogey man and trying to
create more fear
so us stupid Americans give up more of our constitutional
protection for
the sake of security.
Sorry I have bad news.
Both Obama and McCain are well paid members of the CFR and
Bilderbergs
who truely own this country our leaders and our monitary system.
It doesent matter who wins. They answer to their bosses, not to
us.
This whole two party system was designed to keep us polarized,
distracted
and
devided so they can continue to pass laws to destroy our
constitution
without
us even knowing about it. Check out the latest law passed if
you dont
believe
me. The HR1955/HR1959. These are the laws the we aloud our
government
to pass because we were to distracted fighting with eachother.
Wake the F>>k UP!
Obama has it rough. He is trying to run a campaign on the issues
and
keeps getting smacked around by the republicans who think that
he'll lie
down and take it like John Kerry did and Al Gore did. But he's not
doing that. It's hard to be tough and strong against this
constant mud
slinging and still try to hold true to your belief that mud
slinging is
not the way to conduct a campaign. Very hard. He can't let the lies
just sit there either.
Ron Paul tried to run on the constitution, it got him nowhere.
Kuchinach tries to do the same, again, it got him nowhere. We've
got
these two people left and must make a very important decision.
Things
have got to be different.
Jackie- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Reading some of you folks... Damn..
No WONDER!
No wonder what?
Jackie- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Just look at yourselves? You people are ALL over the place!
Yes..THIS... but what about THAT?
That is what I got out of this WHOLE thread.
None of you people take a stand on anything. You (and I mean that in
a very generic sense) people sound like an "independent voter". Much
like me.
Except I took a stance on ONE thing. I voted for George Bush because
I BELIEVED that his presidency would protect ME from ever going
through a Sept 11th again. And on this day....I have the RIGHT to say
that I was RIGHT in making my decision.
Well, you have a right to say whatever you want, but the fact is that
the World Trade Center was attacked when George W. Bush was President
OMG?  I can't even believe the ignorance.
This is an example of holier than thou attitude that helped get the
current president elected (with the help of the Supreme Court the
second time) and the reason the current republican presidential
nominee and vice presidential nominee follow in his footsteps.  Their
type of negative, nasty, mocking, sarcastic smears (and demeanor) work
by appealing to the least common denominator, the most basic, least
sophisticated level of sensibility and opinion among a group of people.
And that last sentence tells me why you plan on voting for Obama. I
expect a statement like that from him. It's called being elitist.
Nah, it came straight out of the dictionary under "least common
denominator".  ;-)  And I'm replying to Sharon's calling me ignorant.
Isn't THAT kinda "elitist"?
Yes you are ignorant.
I don't stand for ANY candidate.  I stand for issues.
 Some people just plain out love it when their candidate stands up and
lies with impunity using vicious sarcasm and nastiness, mocking other
Americans the way Sarah Palin did at the RNC.
Really?  How would YOU know that?
BTW?  I vote INDEPENDENT.  And I really think that people like YOU
have a problem with THAT!
Educate me. What did she state in her speech that is supposedly a lie??
For starters that she said "Thenks but no thenks to that bridge to
nowheer".
from factcheck.org:
Could I POSSIBLY FIND OUT ANYTHING ELSE?
Wait... I have neither the time or the inclination to MAKE SURE...
that what I write about is AGAINST... you.  You want to...
NO FUCKING THANKS!
     *  Palin may have said “Thanks, but no thanks” on the Bridge to
Nowhere, though not until Congress had pretty much killed it already..
But that was a sharp turnaround from the position she took during her
gubernatorial campaign, and the town where she was mayor received lots
of earmarks during her tenure.
Could you "imagine" HER position?  Must have SUCKED to been HER!
Mr Barack HUSSEIN Obama.  The "presumptive nominee".  Has he EVER been
in HER position?  Um... That would be the PRESEDENTIAL nomniee.... NOT
the VICE president.
You people... really... don't you anything ELSE to complain about?
Like your presidential nominee doesn't have IT?
     * Palin’s accusation that Obama hasn’t authored “a single major law
or even a reform” in the U.S. Senate or the Illinois Senate is simply
not a fair assessment. Obama has helped push through major ethics
reforms in both bodies, for example.
For example?
 You can't complain about what Ms Palin HAS done if YOU aren't willing
to say what Mr Barak HUSSEIN Obama HAS done.
     * The Alaska governor avoided some of McCain’s false claims about
Obama’s tax program – but her attacks still failed to give the whole story.
What?  What is Mr Obama's tax program?  I don't know a freaking thing
about it!  Only because HE won't SAY what it is!!
I say for starters because there are pages upon pages of fact checks of
the speech on the internet.  Check it out!
And in the end?  Who fucking cares?  You and me?  Are you voting on
the VICE PRESIDENT?
Seriously, I'll be glad to give you a long list of lies that she has
told after the RNC.  She continues to repeat them, daily!  Let me know
if you want help finding them, I'll be happy to help you.  Not in an
elitist kind of way.  ;-)
Oh please... if you could only see things from an INDEPENDENT view.
Sharon
PS:  IMHO... YOU are an elitist.
Sharon,  IMHO, YOU are FULL of ***!

Jackie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Jackie... IMHO, YOU are FULL of ***!  And I'll tell YOU why.

YOU base every decision YOU make PURELY on EMOTION!!!!

A truly INDEPEDENT voter will vote on who She/He thinks will do the
BEST for our country.

And THAT is ME!

And I will give you examples... From MY life from drum corps.

My lineage....  There is no such BETTER example... than THAT.  Just
LOOK at it...

Not only that... Look at what I have had to do to MAKE one facet of
ONE drum and bugle corps... COUNT!

If THAT isn't an INDEPENDENT.... I don't know what is.

So Jackie?  I really don't care what kind of WEIGHT you carry here?  I
don't care what else ANYONE writes.

Hey Sharon!

I don't give a damn what you think.

And as far as your drum corps experience, you were a freakin' flag.

Don't bother me anymore.

Jackie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Lovely...

So are YOU!

Really!

I'm a freaking flag? Like THAT is your defense?

I was the FREAKING American Flag Carrier too! WANT to MAKE SOMETHING
OF... THAT too?

THAT is YOUR defense?

Um... I just respond to those that THINK that it's THEIR responsibilty
to MAKE sure that what I write isn't so. I believe that what I write
is TRUE.

And You Think That By Writing... that I was a FLAG? Makes YOU look
BETTER?

I don't get THAT!!!!! BTW? If telling the NEWSGROUP that being a
FLAG is some how INFERIOR to the REST of the corps participation? I
can only WISH... hate mail upon you!


Sharon
.

Loading