Re: Hey Mikes Davis and Siglow

On 26 Jun 2007 13:20:02 -0500, Jim Blansett
<jim_blansett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:50:11 -0700, Mike <Imhappy1013@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Jun 25, 8:43 pm, "Catherine" <Catherine@yahoo!!!.com> wrote:
"Mike" <Imhappy1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message>>>

<snipperoo>
Never heard about him until you posted...

Poor reading comprehension. Google. Hey, JB was here in 1995. Too bad he never
told ya, and allowed you to be put in the position of either being not worth
listening to or a liar - whichever. And no matter what has been, I don't see much
resolve to do care more about students not being preyed upon than you do woodwinds.


You have no idea what I care about. You just made that up out of thin
air.

The amazing thing, Mike, even though she tries to implicate me, too, I
never knew the details about Harvey until she broke them on here.
Catherine has a fantasy world in which she develops the scenarios,
adds in the players of her choice, and then disseminates the story in
whatever manner she sees fit. Quite a tidy little package, I think.

I second the motion, JB...as I recall we were staffers extemely
focused on putting a corps on the field, and working for a living...
and with the usual social lives of younger people. I remember
marveling at how good Harvey could "one finger" type...he was pretty
much always in the office while we were in the field.

If society then was emphasizing what it does now, it'd be different,
eh? *Alot* of our acquaintances who were caught with their hands in
the cookie jar may never have done what they did...who knows?

cg
.

Relevant Pages