Re: OT: ... Not like the Nazis, Part II

On 18 Dec 2005 14:15:22 -0800, fluty1@xxxxxxx wrote:

>>(A side note to George: if you
>>really are allergic to David Limbaugh's site, you should feel safer
>>here.)
>
>allergic...that's funny phil.

Did you go look at http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110003210 ?
Do you have any commentary?

> But you're still avoiding my earlier post
>and have chosen to take pot shots in other posts. What a man;]

You are absolutely right. I feel my personal religious preferences
have no bearing whatsoever on this discussion; I have deliberately
avoided that question.

>I feel safe everywhere phil.

I already read your paragraph below.

Yet you foisted a particular prejudice on the group: that David
Limbaugh is incapable of having a secular contribution to a political
debate ( http://davidlimbaugh.com/012903.htm ) simply because he also
makes public religious postings.

It's no real mystery why many are reluctant to publicly speak of their
personal religious preferences.

> I can take care of myself, drumcorps
>training, growing up in the city and all that jazz. Why would a punk
>ass, bible thumping, lets sell God for profit, big fat idiots brother
>scare me other than the fact that people like you believe these blood
>sucking, anti Christian, book pushing, right wing "kill um all for God"
>assholes who prey on anyone weak enough or stupid enough to think God
>is on our side.
>Have you read any other of Davey lipblinds right wing rants?

No.

I provided you with an alternative source; you were always free to
look for one on your own. Do you have anything on-topic to say here?

>George

--phil

.

Loading