To Richard V. Lamb a/k/a Vince Lamb a/k/a Pinku Sensei a/k/a DarkSumomo and his DCW Enablers (was KKI Analysis of PSYLVIA PSULLIVAN and a nomination was Ping - Pinku-Sensei {<snipped>})

Posted to RAMD - other NGs snipped. Feel free to "analyze" (anal-yze) this and
cross-post it to AUK, Vince - and demonstrate even more what you are willing to
neglect while you demonstrate what you value.

"Pinku-Sensei" <DarkSumomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1123399955.646694.195650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Sean Monaghan wrote:

> As Sean requested, I'm doing a Kooksign Koncentration Index
> analysis of this PSCREECHING PSYLVIA poast.

I'm still waiting to see the analysis of how someone like you, Vince, who allegedly
met me in 1978 and quoted me after decades and before I even knew about RAMD, could
have gone this entire time without mentioning your connections with Harvey Berish and
his DCPA history. I'm even more interested in all those east coasters who knew very
well that Berish was a convicted child molester on probation who had to move west
said NOTHING while Berish was involved with children in his targeted age group.

"Funny" that you don't remember any such discussions - or continue to demonstrate
that you know how to keep some things "private". Interesting that Berish could have
been selling upright two-valve bugles which have "helped" the blando evolution of
DCI, but no one thought to mention to us the degree to which he was lying about his
alleged "adoption" of boys.

Since this is the beginning of DCI week, I can see where you would prefer to have
people discussing alleged trolls (or FREAKS) on RAMD. It's what you're not talking
about which is far more interesting to drum corps people - as well as the corporate
interests that continue to stand by therefor, while they advertise their wares in
DCW. It's been the same exploitation of young people which has existed for three
decades - silence on the one set of issues while sales continue on the other.

<other exchange snipped>

> Analysis begins here. There are 743 original words in this poast.

<snipping out what Lamb alleges he is analyzing and leaving Lamb's words>

1. Idiosyncratic usage of "THE GANG".
<snip>
2. PKB Projection about delusion.
3. Idiosyncratic usage of "USENET GANGS"
<snip>
4. Projection.
5. Idiosyncratic usage.
6. POAST IS IN ALL CAPS (one point for each paragraph)
<snip>
7. Unsubstantiated incriminating claim.
<snip>
This could actually be a reasonable claim, not a kooksign, as
PSCREECHING PSYLVIA could just be an incompetent who has no business
being around a computer, but could handle a WebTV box just fine. Not
all incompetents are K00ks and some K00ks are actually capable.
However, PSCREECHING PSYLVIA is widely considered to be a K00k, and is
cementing her reputation as one with poasts like this. If she persists
in her cluelessness throughout this poast, I'll award her a point for
this sentence.
<snip>
8. Ignorant assumption--accounts can be hacked even on a central
system. The email accounts of contestants on the first Survivor were
hacked into, and they were most likely on Yahoo and Hotmail, the latter
also a MS service where messages are stored on a central system.
<snip>
9. Ignorant assertion about the mentality of hackers, not that the
kookologists are hackers. Some hackers think the bigger the target,
the better.
<snip>
10. Ignorant assertion about kookologists. Soc.men, alt.astronomy, and
alt.music.michael-jackson are excellent example of kookologists taking
on groups.
<snip>
11. Another ignorant assertion about the behavior on aca--Jimmy
Neutron, ahem, Gerald Newton is also a subject of kookological
investigation on aca.
<snip>
12. *snicker* Extremely ignorant assertion about the nature of USENET
in general and alt.usenet.kooks in particular. USENET is the world's
largest functioning anarchy--it has no government. AUK has no leader,
although it has a Vote Wrangler, which is not Chadwick.
13. Object of obsession mentioned (Hi, Chadwick--you're being obsessed
over!)
14. Delusional statement.
<snip>
15. Paranoia displayed.
<snip>
16. Ignorant misuse of "domains".
17. Stereotypical lame of GANGS.
<snip>
18. Ungrammatical construction contributing to illucidity.
<snip>
19. Ignorance of meaning of spam; it's entirely possible that
PSCREEDING PSYLVIA is spamming.
20. Based on the utter display of clueslessness about the medium she is
using, I'm going to award that k00ksign point that I reserved judgment
on earlier.
21. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
22. Delusional statement about intent.
23. Ignorance of what constitutes cyber-stalking.
24. Idiosyncratic usage bordering on Goofy Azzed Babboonery.
25. Conspiracy Theory.
26. Subject of obsession.
27. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
28. Paranoia.
29-30. Objects of obsession mentioned.
31. Stereotypical lame.
<snip>
32. Denial of why kookologists are interested in her--she's a
fascinating object of study;
33. Ignorant, unsubstantiated assertion of motive--explicit use of
kookology as revenge is frowned upon.
34. Object of obsession mentioned.
35. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
36. Idiosyncratic use of "the truth".
37. Grandiose claim.
38. K00ky punctuation contributing to illucidity.
<snip>
39. Invented term.
40. Unintentional self-spank, as GOTI looks like Gotti, resulting in
humorous connotations and implications.
41. Subject of obsession mentioned.
<snip>
42. Grandiose claim--who is the "us" in "our", the voices in PSYLVIA's
head?
<snip>
43. Another grandiose and unsubstatiated claim--how many newsgroups has
PSCREEDING PSYLVIA's campaign reached? How many of them has she
reached by her own poasts (this may be why Chadwick Stone called her a
spammer)? How many have been reaced by the kookologists passing on the
word to the volatile froups so that more people can laugh at her silly
attempts at organized netkkkoping?
<snip>
44. Threat of netkkkopping.
45. Misunderstanding of the role of the federal government in
regulating internet behavior.
46. Misunderstanding of how TOS works.
47. Utter ignornance of the composition of the readership of AUK--how
does she think that Google Groups came to describe her home froup the
way it does?
48. Idiosyncratic usage of words.
49. Object of obsession mentioned.
<snip>
50. Malformed placement of links.
51. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
52. Another netkkkopping threat.
53. Grandiose claim lacking support--who are the ISPs that she thinks
are supporting her?
54. Illucid construction of paragraph.
55-59. Idiosyncratic usage of words and phrases.
60. Subject of obsession mentioned (Project GOTI).
61. Object of obsession noted (USENET GANGS)
62. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
63. Yet another netkkkopping threat.
64-67. Idiosyncratic usage of words and phrases.
68. IKYABWAI Projection.
69. Objects of obsession mentioned.
70. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
71. Complete misunderstanding of the content of the quoted document.
72. Denial that the description of "Teh Way of teh K00K" applies to
her.
73. Grammatical errors contributing to illucidity.
74. Stereotypical lame
75. Objects of obsession mentioned.
<snip>
76. One more threat of netkkkopping.
77. Grandiose claim.
78. Idiosyncratic use of words.
79. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
80. Idiosyncratic use of words and phrases.
81. Attempt to troll others into helping her with her netkkkopping.
82. Grandiose opinion of her role on USENET.
83. Subject of obsession noted.
84. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
85. Ridiculous requirement--n00bs are more likely to be disturbed by
trolling, UPA, and flaming than old-timers, therefore, PSCREEDING
PSYLVIA is making a poor political decision. Then, again, what else is
new? What percent of the vote did she get in the 1998 Alaska
Gubernatorial Election?
<snip>
86. Idiosyncratic usage of words and phrases.
87. Ignorance of the anarchic nature of USENET.
88. Object of obsession mentioned.
<snip>
89. Inane comment, as in one that makes you say "Yeah, right" or "No
***."
<snip>
90. Grandiose opinion of herself.
91. Idiosyncratic use of words and phrases.
92. As if her threats of netkkkopping weren't enough, PSCREEDING
PSYLVIA demonstrates the deep, wide streak of control freak that she
has.
93. Objects of obsession mentioned.
94. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
95-97. Idiosyncratic use of words and phrases.
98. Grandiose opinion of self.
99. Threat of netkkkopping.
100. Grandiose claim of knowledge.
101. Subject of obsession mentioned.
<snip>
102-106. Idiosyncratic use of words and phrases.
107. Another threat of netkkkopping.
108. Fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of an unmoderated
froup.
109. Denial of her role in what she considers to be a problem.
110. Ignorant misuse of domain.
111. Grandiose vision of results.
112. Idiosyncratic use of punctuation contributing to illucidity.
113-114. Objects of obsession mentioned
115. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
116. Grandiose claim.
117. Idiosyncratic use of punctuation contributing to illucidity.
118. Yet more of her appeal to assist her in her netkkkopping campaign.
119. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
120-121. Idiosyncratic use of words and phrases.
123. PKB projection.
124. Yet more appealling to assist her in her netkkkopping campaign.
125. General grandiosity.
126. Desire for control above and beyond netkkkopping.
127. Malformed punctuation contributing to illucidity.
129. Object of obession mentioned.
130. Subject of obsession mentioned.
131. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
132. Object of obsession mentioned.
133. Idiosyncratic use of words.
<snip>
134. Subject of obsession mentioned.
135. Appeal to join campaign in favor of netkkkopping.
136. Idiosyncratic use of words.
<snip>
137. Misleading statement--the links below do not identify the members
of the gangs.
138. Object of obsession noted.
139. Idiosyncratic use of words
140. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA CAPS POINT at end of paragraph.
<snip>
I have done as you have so kindly requested. PSCREECHING PSYLVIA has
displayed 140 kooksigns over the course of 763 words, resulting in a
KKI of 0.183. That's not as high as Catherine, but it is a record for
a recognized k00k. In honor of her achievement, I am nominating
PSCREECHING PSYLVIA for the Pickett's Charge award for August.

Seconds?

--
Pinku-Sensei AKA Stinku Bruce
Official Overseer of Kooks in rec.arts.marching.drumcorps

********************************************************************

The only thing "fascinating", Mr. Lamb, is how someone who is - according to you - so
ignorant could be such a fascinating study. Now I realize that someone with an ego
like yours would perhaps enjoy hurling "ignorant" as an epithet, particularly when
such a characterization is a cover for disagreement. Such plays up to the
defelction/deflection of self-interested discussion from any sort of resolution, as
well as playing to the positioning of the accuser as someone with the "official"
<yeah, riiiiiiiight> ability to judge.

"Funny" how you no longer advertise yourself as the expert on RAMD in DCW and on RAMD
under yer own name anymore. Must suck to have to protect that "Ph.D." you worked so
hard to get. And while you and your "friends" here and in DCW are so very proud of
all them awards and degrees (though the gRAMDies are no longer included therein
amongst all audiences), and so much attention was paid to my little degree and Sam
Vaknin's Ph.D.

Too bad the same standards and examinations weren't applied to "Dr. Harvey Berish"
when you and Stuart Rice made him a symposium keynote speaker. (However, it is
somewhat ironic that Bill Cook can understand the feelings of drum & bugle corps
alumni who have to endure what you lying frauds subsequently have attempted to do
using drum & bugle corps. He was, after all, one of the earlier symposium writers
who has since stood by for seeing Dr. Berish subsequently so "honored".)

So you, DCI.org, DCIToday, DCW and all the rest of the corporate rags, continue to
market to all those ignorant people out there - whose ignorance y'all depend upon.
It's your own self-hatred that you reveal - because you have condemned yourselves to
this mediocrity.

Must suck to know that your only importance, er... place in "drum corp." is due to
your being an enabler of bullies and a partial cause of the continuation of the
ignorance you claim to despise. I 'spose you hafta do what you hafta do "in order to
be successful" - but there is nothing excellent about it, under even a corrupted
value system.

Your deep and sincere concerns about control freaks, "the truth", illucidity,
inanity, TOSs, ISP and government concerns, netkkkopping, explicit use of kookology
as revenge being frowned upon (oh, whatta giveaway), et al., are noted and given the
consideration they deserve (and from the relative silence on AUK, you appear to be
failing there as well).

One hasta wonder where you learned all these scholarly values, Vince -- at yer
accredited colleges which gave you yer cherished degrees, or at DCW, or with Berish
and Oliverio as "the mentality that rules DCI"...

-- Catherine


.