Re: BBC should have stuck with Doctor Who. 22 million goes down the toilet with The Voice!
- From: meowmix <meow.mix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 14:54:55 +0100
On Sun, 27 May 2012 21:20:15 +0100, "Agamemnon" <agamemnon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thrashed by Eurovision and it cost 22 million quid to make. Doctor Who only
cost 6 million and has always had much higher ratings at this time of year
so why did the BBC cut the number of episodes in the series in half?
Even the football on ITV got more viewers than The Voice, 4.64 million.
"The Voice UK semi-final got under way with a whimper as 4.49m tuned in,
while Engelbert Humperdinck's Eurovision failure drew in an audience of
7.47m."
http://www.metro.co.uk/tv/900335-the-voice-uk-beaten-by-eurovision-as-ratings-hit-new-low-of-4-49m
http://www.mirror.co.uk/opinion/lifestyle-opinion/kevin-o-sullivan/holly-willoughbys-breasts-fail-to-lift-848882
we won it. i say we, the mrs and nippers as they're swedes and i'm english. i don't see how anyone with any crediblility
would want to win that crap?
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: What do Matt Smith and Pudsey have in common?
- Next by Date: Re: BBC should have stuck with Doctor Who. 22 million goes down the toilet with The Voice!
- Previous by thread: Re: BBC should have stuck with Doctor Who. 22 million goes down the toilet with The Voice!
- Next by thread: The Face-Eater
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|