Re: OT: Richard Dawkins Article in the Times



On 2009-08-29 09:35:40 +0100, "Stephen Wilson" <stephen.wilson2004nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:


"Andrew" <thecroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2009082900102050073-thecroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Who made "Nature" ??

The difference is, there's no need to invoke anyone to make nature; it
is by its, ahem, nature self-creating and self-sustaining.

You do realise don't you, Phil, that if you admit of a concept that is
"self creating and self-sustaining" then it could also be called "God",
don't you? If so, then there is no need to invoke a 'separate creative
force'

Isn't that a rather tautalogical argument?

Humans are so complicated which proves they must have had a creator. That
creator is God and he must be far more complicated than human. But he didn't
need a creator.

How does that work?

It's not tautologous in itself, no. You are, in fact, introducing a whole different argument. The argument from complexity (which, in any case, is unconvincing) is based on a very particular usage of the word "complex" - a system composed of a large number of unique parts, all of which have to be in place for the system to function is said to be complex. The difficulty with the argument is that one's inability to see how that system could have come about by undirected processes does not mean that it did not.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: hens dying?
    ... Are you questioning the intent of the creator or evolution? ... very few of them harm humans. ... Man is an irrational creature. ...
    (sci.agriculture.poultry)
  • Re: Obamas Faith in the Golden Rule
    ... "myths" that people have built over time, which apes and monkeys play ... mysteries were formed for humans to solve by a creator who wanted ... There is no evidence for a creator, nor for the need for one. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Ludicrous Christian comments. :-)
    ... "Drums" wrote in a message ... Personally I believe in intelligent design. ... I look around at humans and I realize they are ... then there could be no creator and he cannot have created something ...
    (rec.music.makers.percussion)
  • Re: Obamas Faith in the Golden Rule
    ... "myths" that people have built over time, which apes and monkeys play ... mysteries were formed for humans to solve by a creator who wanted ... There is no evidence for a creator, nor for the need for one. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: OT: Richard Dawkins Article in the Times
    ... Who made "Nature" ?? ... there's no need to invoke anyone to make nature; ... Humans are so complicated which proves they must have had a creator. ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)

Loading