Re: Idioanthropinogenogamotic judge costs Miss California Miss USA crown.


"Mr.Smartypants" <bcpg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:215a310e-296c-4476-8885-03c9ca35eb0b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 22, 3:19 pm, "Agamemnon" <agamem...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Agamemnon" <agamem...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:upOdnTG-4b4-_nLUnZ2dnUVZ8r-dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




And another question. Why was a gay man allowed to judge a beauty contest
involving women in the first place?



<<<Perhaps gays *should* judge all beauty contests. They wouldn't take
sex bribes from the women and therefore would remain objective.>>>

Nope. The main criteria for determining the winner of beauty contest involving women is which woman gives you the best stiffy. A gay man would be totally unsuitable as a judge




> She told the audience: "I think that I believe that a marriage should be
> between a man and a woman.

Just imagine Gary Glitter being made a judge and being allowed to coerce the
contestants with a question like, "The age of consent in Spain and many
parts of the world 13 years old. Do you think that every state should follow
their example and allow sex with 13 year old children and explain the
reasons for your answer?"




<<<So? Most women would probably say "No! It's way too young">>>

Just like most women would say "No! Marriage is meant to be between a man and a woman", but not if they are confronted with that question from a judge at a beauty contest whose opinion may determine if they will win or not.




.

Relevant Pages