Re: Further Proof Of Nodtroll's Incompetence
- From: "Agamemnon" <agamemnon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:32:51 +0100
"Adam" <adam.mitchell744@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Uu2Jl.75461$W21.60397@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Agamemnon" <agamemnon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:zfKdncLMOeRhMmnUnZ2dnUVZ8hidnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
a
"Nod" <Nod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:W32Jl.55833$Le.5320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Imipak supplied the following renders. And very nice they were.
>
> |Let's do a comparison, shall we?
>
> http://freefilm.sourceforge.net/images/titanic1.png
> http://freefilm.sourceforge.net/images/titanic2.png
>
> Agaygayman replied with the following (and without a sense of irony).
>
>
> "Agamemnon" <agamemnon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:foudnYTf7_g9hWnUnZ2dnUVZ8r2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> |
> | If all you wanted was a zoom then take a look at this which took > about> | minute. The fact that you can see the polygons proves that the modelyou> | provided was total and utter crap. Even the life boats are flat.Where
> |
> | http://www.enthymia.co.uk/titanic2.jpg
> |
> | You call that a render? You call that water? Where are the waves?
>
> And
>
> | YOU'VE LOST!
> |
> | http://www.enthymia.co.uk/titanic.jpg
>
> Agatha completely missing the fact that his picture was just a flat > blue
> for
> water.
You are missing the fact that it was YOUR model and YOUR water, and YOUR
software.
>
> In fact I could say. | You call that a render? You call that water?
> are the waves?but
>
> And here's the version I did with the same model. I just loaded it and
> plonked it into the scene. The water was just default Carrara 6 water,
> that's the same water as earlier versions. It proves Agatha is lyingabout> the model though. (But we knew that anyway.)out
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHL2mWZuWnA
You call that a render and an animation? Half the ship's hull is green and
the other half is red cut across vertically. Clearly YOUR model is not
compatible with any software at all.
And remember that the software that YOU provided me with was NOT Carrara
Studio but Caligari trueSpace7.6 which doesn't do water or reflections and
practically sod all else.
>
> And a reminder of Agaygayman's challenge which he is a week behind at
> completing.
>
> ||> > You're the clueless fool, but how about you use your PC to knock
> aand
> | 5
> ||> > minute Titanic clone and prove it can be done?
> ||>
> ||> You provide me with the software and the models and I will do that.
>
> Or rather, provide the models and software and still watch him squirm
> whine like a cat abusing bitch.
>
> | It is clearly not fit for purpose. Where is the model, complete with
> | animation and software used by James Cameron?
>
> So very, very sad.
That you have LOST!
Why do you say you can do something if you can't? It makes you look like a
retard.
It's not my fault if his useless models won't load properly into the useless software he provided you deranged mentally retarded idiot.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Further Proof Of Nodtroll's Incompetence
- From: Alan Sailsbury
- Re: Further Proof Of Nodtroll's Incompetence
- From: Nod
- Re: Further Proof Of Nodtroll's Incompetence
- From: Mr.Smartypants
- Re: Further Proof Of Nodtroll's Incompetence
- References:
- Further Proof Of Agatha's Incompetence
- From: Nod
- Re: Further Proof Of Nodtroll's Incompetence
- From: Agamemnon
- Further Proof Of Agatha's Incompetence
- Prev by Date: Re: NAZIS Taught Their Victims Well
- Next by Date: Re: Yads and Christianity
- Previous by thread: Re: Further Proof Of Nodtroll's Incompetence And Insanity.
- Next by thread: Re: Further Proof Of Nodtroll's Incompetence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|