Re: Idioanthropinogenogamotic judge costs Miss California Miss USA crown.


<pbowles@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:77427c59-e885-4e98-ae2d-dd37a6f497d3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 23 Apr, 00:27, "Agamemnon" <agamem...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Mr.Smartypants" <b...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:215a310e-296c-4476-8885-03c9ca35eb0b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 22, 3:19 pm, "Agamemnon" <agamem...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> "Agamemnon" <agamem...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

>news:upOdnTG-4b4-_nLUnZ2dnUVZ8r-dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> And another question. Why was a gay man allowed to judge a beauty > contest
> involving women in the first place?

<<<Perhaps gays *should* judge all beauty contests. They wouldn't take
sex bribes from the women and therefore would remain objective.>>>

Nope. The main criteria for determining the winner of beauty contest
involving women is which woman gives you the best stiffy. A gay man would be
totally unsuitable as a judge

I'm never sure if anyone can really be as shallow as your act.

It's a fact.


> > She told the audience: "I think that I believe that a marriage should > > be
> > between a man and a woman.

> Just imagine Gary Glitter being made a judge and being allowed to > coerce
> the
> contestants with a question like, "The age of consent in Spain and many
> parts of the world 13 years old. Do you think that every state should
> follow
> their example and allow sex with 13 year old children and explain the
> reasons for your answer?"

<<<So? Most women would probably say "No! It's way too young">>>

Just like most women would say "No! Marriage is meant to be between a man
and a woman", but not if they are confronted with that question from a judge
at a beauty contest whose opinion may determine if they will win or not.

Aggy, think of it as an exam. If you had this question on an exam
intended to test your reasoning and the only answer you could give is
"Marriage is meant to be between a man and a woman", you'd quite
rightly fail.

Rubbish. I'd pass with distinction since that is what marriage is. Or do you want us to go back to the times in ancient Britain where people married sheep, goats and ducks. Even in those times they never allowed a man to marry another man.

Who "meant" it to be that way? Why were they right to do

Marriage was about having legitimate children to be your heirs. If a man wanted to pass on his possessions to another man he had the option of making a will.

so? What reason is there for denying one segment of the population a
right enjoyed by others?

They have no been denied any right. They are still perfectly free to have children by a member of the opposite sex and have then recognised as their heirs. It is biologically impossible for a man to have children by kologamising another man therefore marriage is inapplicable to them. What next. Will idioanthropinogenogamotic men start complaining that they aren't able to have periods?

Even if she'd said "I believe marriage is
about providing a stable environment in which to have and raise
children, something gay couples can't biologically do" it would have
suggested some sign of electrical activity in her brain. "Because I
was told that's the way it should be" suggests she's a twit.

No it does not. It suggests that she was brought up properly and she is sound of mind as well as body. Her reply made the idioanthropinogenogamotic judge look like he was a sick pervert with no sense of morality along with the people who supported him. He tried to use his authority to coerce the woman into endorsing his beliefs just like the gay priests did when abusing small boys, and just like RTD has continually attempted to do by abusing his position as head writer and executive producer of Doctor Who and Torchwood to make children accept idioanthropinogenogamosis.

And another question. Was this contest directed at a family audience before the watershed, because if it was being watched by children who heard the gay judge preaching to them then it would have violated the Ofcom code of conduct on another count since it contained material only suitable for adults.


Phil

.

Relevant Pages