Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- From: "john smith" <the_johnsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:44:51 GMT
"L. Ross Raszewski" <lraszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrnfvpjaa.fgg.lraszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 01:32:51 GMT, john smith
<the_johnsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wrote "Queer as Folk" (and others) - got prestige in the TV industry -
brought back "Doctor Who". How great is that?
Plus - surely the Doctor is an atheist? He's from a much more advanced
civilisation than ours. As if Time Lords - with their god-like
super-advanced technologies - are going to believe in superstition...
Maybe as an advanced being he knows that there *is* a god for an
absolute fact. That would be a fine reason to believe.
Your argument is much like the arguments that the doctor "must" be a
vegetarian, or "must" be gay, or "must" be straight. THey all boil
down to:
1. I believe X to be true.
2. The Doctor is better than me
3. Therefore the Doctor would not believe something that is false, and
would believe something that is true.
4. THerefore the doctor must agree with me on every issue.
It wasn't an argument; it was a suggestion. Get over yourself!
.
- References:
- Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- From: Ian Salsbury
- Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- From: ajb9992nd
- Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- From: Jeremiah Harbottle
- Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- From: Andrew
- Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- From: john smith
- Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- From: Andrew
- Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- From: john smith
- Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- From: Andrew
- Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- From: john smith
- Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- From: L. Ross Raszewski
- Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- Prev by Date: Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Proof that Yads is a spambot?
- Previous by thread: Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- Next by thread: Re: Dawkins, Davies and daughters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|