Re: From Shakespeare COde, racial relations

On 2007-07-04, The Doctor <doctor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <k6orl4-kq.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Simon Brooke <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For the third time, science doesn't - and can't - ever prove anything. The
scientific method works by refutation, not by proof.


Then refute your existence.

He's already refuted yours. Prove *you* exist!

--
Chris

"Well, Id say that was a sin all right... and it was certainly original."
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Theories, models, and simplifications
    ... >> is some sort of agreement on the scientific method. ... experiments but I am and all of science ... >> You have agreed with Popper's requirement for refutation ... Either junk Popper or provide an apology. ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: From Shakespeare COde, racial relations
    ... For the third time, science doesn't - and can't - ever prove anything. ... scientific method works by refutation, ... Then refute your existence. ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)
  • Re: OT: Religious kerfluffle, was Re: OT - Re: Tim Daneluk
    ... I could refute about 90% of what you wrote simply by explaining ... I attack science or its methodology. ... making an argument against outdated notions of the state of philosophy, ... Theory as it pertains to your disregard for evolution viz. ...
    (rec.woodworking)
  • Re: When London is submerged and New York is awash...
    ... you dimiss what you cannot refute. ... We should *use* peer-reviewed science in our debate, ... I won't dismiss *your* arguments, ... >the arguments and they appear to be sound. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: The state-of-the-art in mathematics
    ... But, refutation by other means such as internet forum, ... have been checked, not necessarily conscientiously, by a single referee. ... Remember that the responsibility for errors in papers does not lie ... To refute an alleged proof, you can either point out a ...
    (sci.math)