Re: Would I Lie With You ?

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:59:38 +0100, "Hercule Platini"
<ningynongy@xxxxxxx> wrote:


"Ignis Fatuus" <Ignis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jhtu73tphc3fc5bgv17ftg69qo229e4us6@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:58:44 +0100, The Face of Po
<gkennington@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ignis Fatuus told the audient void (and rec.arts.drwho):
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:09:35 +0100, "Hercule Platini"
"Ignis Fatuus" <Ignis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

Barrowman at 9.51

Are any of these one-line non random spurtings supposed to be
interesting?
[...]

My thoughts exactly as I was watching the show.

Could you save them up till the end of the episode and post them all in
a single thread? As you seem to be watching the episode when you've
crawled in drunk during the small hours, it's not like you're beating
anyone to the punch by engaging in rear-view-mirror-posting.

Apart from one well publicised occasion I'm usually sober. I would use
a single threat If it was possible to incorporate individual headers
into that thread. These (unsatisfactory) multi-part stories offer an
opportunity for a little experimentation in form. I could save it all
up and post it afterwards, but the effect's not quite the same as
engaging in a 'live commentary to which you're committed at each
successive stage.

But it's only a live commentary if we're [1] watching the episode at the
same time and [2] also accessing your posts at the same time. Looked at the
following day it's just a series of one line messages that don't appear to
mean anything, and don't immediately appear to be connected to Dr Who. What
the hell does Scrotum Driver mean?

Read the comment.

It's live when I watch it; and if I'm careful about the time then the
messages all arrive consecutively, without disrupting the flow of new
threads. You end up with a block of meaningless commentary - and you
don't have to wade through it to pick up where you left off. The
messages all refer to lines of dialogue from the recently broadcast
episode - and the contents refer to my response to the line or the
build-up. The challenge is to deliver the commentary during my first
encounter with the episode - and without considering my response
before the reaction and the delivery.

= IF

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [ST:TOS:RM][Notes] Mudds Women
    ... _Enterprise_ mess hall/rec deck that spanned three decks and had ... Martha Jones Saves The World episode completely wrong. ... It's odd watching this to realize that Harry Mudd would be ... Mining is one ...
    (rec.arts.startrek.tech)
  • Re: What Did You Watch 2010-10-14 (Thursday)
    ... Community - the study group is trapped in a "Space Simulator" ... 30 Rock - Live, East Coast episode. ... isn't funny by the time they get to Saturday, ... Undercovers - finished watching this show after going to bed on ...
    (rec.arts.tv)
  • Re: more about mice
    ... Beth wrote: ... > But then the Atlantis episode and the "cafe" episode spoilt the image of ... Besides, whenever I start watching an episode, I usually forget all the ... spoilers I'd read beforehand. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: CBSs "Bloods," "Hawaii," "Molly," "Defenders," "Bleep" get full-season orders
    ... episode was when I realized I was watching something I really wanted ... but I really hope the Emmy folks get hit over the the ... The call will probably come down on some FX network exec's head. ...
    (rec.arts.tv)
  • Re: OT: Any other "Deadliest Catch" fans on here?
    ... Deadliest Catch fan. ... watching him chain smoke with a severe pneumonia. ... an episode. ... Deadliest Catch has had some "fake controversy" too... ...
    (rec.games.pinball)