Re: My thoughts on the Eccleston year.


"John Pertwee" <johnpertweeapww@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:rhabr154np48d3di8m3c60alblnh1oo81o@xxxxxxxxxx
> On 30 Dec 2005 10:29:41 -0800, "Murphoid" <Murphoid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>Frankymole wrote:
>>> When's he going to his first convention? ;-)
>>
>>
>>I could be wrong on this but I don't think he will do conventions. He
>>has a very active career you know and convention money probably just
>>doesn't stack up.
>
> People said McGann would never do a con, and look what happened. If we
> are VERY lucky, he will do a few Big Finish audios for us ten years
> from. If we are VERY, VERY lucky, he will come back for a multi-Doctor
> story at some point.
>
> One fact remains. If all we ever have are these 13 episodes, we will
> always be left wanting more. Is that really such a bad way for him to
> go out? How many people can say they went out on top like that?

He himself said he went into a bit of a repetitive loop - far from "on top".

Maybe his agent thought he could do better?
--

Frank
"Incidentally, I'm a bit alarmed by your assumptions that thinking and
laughing are mutually exclusive activities. Best wishes, Douglas Adams"


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: My thoughts on the Eccleston year.
    ... >Frankymole wrote: ... >I could be wrong on this but I don't think he will do conventions. ... >has a very active career you know and convention money probably just ... If we are VERY, VERY lucky, he will come back for a multi-Doctor ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)
  • Re: My thoughts on the Eccleston year.
    ... > Frankymole wrote: ... > I could be wrong on this but I don't think he will do conventions. ... Look at Janet Fielding. ... I'll never ever do audios etc etc. ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)