Re: Audience Appreciation figures
- From: doctor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (The Doctor)
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:02:47 -0400
In article <slrnfvu6j9.c67.andyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Andy Leighton <andyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:21:28 -0400,
Shannon Patrick Sullivan <shannon@xxxxxx> wrote:
Somewhere in time and space, Stephen Wilson said:
Stil Stats is a science.
No Yads, stats is not a science. It is a branch of mathematics.
In fairness to Dave, mathematics (and hence statistics) is usually
considered to be one of the sciences.
No it isn't. At least not by the scientists or mathmeticians I know
in the UK.
On which authority? University? Polling firms?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doctor@xxxxxxxxxx Ici doctor@xxxxxxxxxx
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Audience Appreciation figures
- From: Andy Leighton
- Re: Audience Appreciation figures
- From: The Master
- Re: Audience Appreciation figures
- References:
- Audience Appreciation figures
- From: The Onions of Doom
- Re: Audience Appreciation figures
- From: Stephen Wilson
- Re: Audience Appreciation figures
- From: Shannon Patrick Sullivan
- Re: Audience Appreciation figures
- From: Andy Leighton
- Audience Appreciation figures
- Prev by Date: Re: Audience Appreciation figures
- Next by Date: Re: Audience Appreciation figures
- Previous by thread: Re: Audience Appreciation figures
- Next by thread: Re: Audience Appreciation figures
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|