Re: Boundaries of Time
- From: doctor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (The Doctor)
- Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 17:48:21 -0400
In article <l3hgg.1984$uP.742@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Stephen Wilson <sr.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"The Doctor" <doctor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e5s3i4$97n$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No they do not. The ARk and Frontios assumes Gallifrey exists.
End of the World / New Earth assumes Gallifrey is dead.
Not really. When the Doctor got involved in the Ark and Frontios, Gallifrey
*did* exist. It's only been destroyed in his timeline somewhere between the
TV movie and Rose.
So there's no problem, is there?!
There is. Does Gallifrey exist when Earth is burnt up?
Frontios says yes.
Does Gallifrey end up dead in all time.
End ofthe World says yes.
PAradox.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doctor@xxxxxxxxxx Ici doctor@xxxxxxxxxx
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Beware Linux the MS Windows of Unix! Demand UseNet an integral part of Internet!
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Boundaries of Time
- From: Neil Sullivan
- Re: Boundaries of Time
- References:
- Re: Boundaries of Time
- From: Neil Sullivan
- Re: Boundaries of Time
- From: The Doctor
- Re: Boundaries of Time
- From: Stephen Wilson
- Re: Boundaries of Time
- Prev by Date: Re: The Impossible Planet (maybe spoilers)
- Next by Date: Re: Boundaries of Time
- Previous by thread: Re: Boundaries of Time
- Next by thread: Re: Boundaries of Time
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
