Re: Which as the better companion couple?
- From: Daibhid Ceanaideach <daibhidchenedelh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 08:46:25 -0400
Also Sprach The Doctor:
In article <Xns979DA38B2C571daibhid@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Daibhid Ceanaideach <daibhidchenedelh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Romana and K9 Mark II, then.
That still does not cut it. Gender and Opposite Gender
would do.
Funny, I use phrases like "there's a couple of kids over
there" or "it was a couple of years ago" without any thought
to gender (or, indeed, whether they joined the TARDIS crew at
the same time...)
--
Dave
Official Absentee of EU Skiffeysoc
http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/sesoc
"Sometimes scientific progress requires personal sacrifice.
Personally, I sacrifice Beaker." -Dr Bunsen Honeydew
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which as the better companion couple?
- From: Andy Leighton
- Re: Which as the better companion couple?
- References:
- Which as the better companion couple?
- From: The Doctor
- Re: Which as the better companion couple?
- From: Sean Huxter
- Re: Which as the better companion couple?
- From: The Doctor
- Re: Which as the better companion couple?
- From: Daibhid Ceanaideach
- Re: Which as the better companion couple?
- From: The Doctor
- Which as the better companion couple?
- Prev by Date: Re: Subtitles say the funniest things...
- Next by Date: Re: Proof positive that the UNIT years are the 1980s
- Previous by thread: Re: Which as the better companion couple?
- Next by thread: Re: Which as the better companion couple?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|