Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- From: Daibhid Ceannaideach <daibhidchenedelh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:13:20 -0400
"Frankymole" <ask_for_it@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:deas4c$o73$1
@news6.svr.pol.co.uk:
> Alan G McWhan wrote:
>> "Frankymole" <ask_for_it@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:de383c$t4b$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> So, was he asked?
>>
>> Hang on, I'll just ask him... how the hell do I know?
>
> So why base a premise on your supposedly knowing?
Wasn't Alan's premise explicitly based on extrapolation from the fact
Eccleston had done a lot of films and *never* done a DVD commentary,
rather than any "inside knowledge"?
In any case, what difference does it make? Alan's theory is that he
doesn't do commentaries, yours is that he hates Doctor Who. In both of
these cases, if asked, he'd have said no, so why bring it up?
--
Dave
Official Absentee of EU Skiffeysoc
http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/sesoc/
Do not read this sig, by order.
.
- References:
- Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- From: Frankymole
- Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- From: gclapperton
- Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- From: Alan G McWhan
- Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- From: Frankymole
- Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- From: Alan G McWhan
- Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- From: Frankymole
- Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- From: Alan G McWhan
- Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- From: Frankymole
- Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- From: Alan G McWhan
- Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- From: Frankymole
- Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- Prev by Date: Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- Next by Date: Re: Doctors diverge
- Previous by thread: Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- Next by thread: Re: Eccleston contrinues to be a prima donna
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|