Re: undis
- From: stormlover1965@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 28 Mar 2006 21:42:19 -0800
Beware the group, though. I've recently posted this on my board and
thought you should be aware of what they're like. These people have
been responsible for the recent foul troll posts about Flowerschild on
RADP. They've also posted people's addresses and pictures of their
houses (that were later removed by EZBoard for privacy violations).
They have tampered with, and WILL tamper with, your private life. And
they won't lose a moment's sleep over it.
_________________________
kingunclehowie
Vet with a 'tude
(3/26/06 9:31 am)
Reply Thanks For The Memories
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thanks to JB's passion for using up hard drives i clicked on the link
and then read all the old stuff; onen thing i found was that some
things do not change:
the following was the review tripleS/JANE wrote about ritas book on the
barnes and noble website in which she 'mistakenly' names me as an owner
of the site and accuses me of some nasty doings:
[removed for copyright violation
Edited by: ezlegal at: 3/28/06 8:56 pm
_________________________
kingunclehowie
Vet with a 'tude
(3/26/06 9:47 am)
Reply Re: Thanks For The Memories
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
anyone notice that on the barnes and noble site she mentioned about
her deafness and cocKlear implants for the world to see? thats about 4
years ago - you would think she would stop by now
but.......................................
_________________________
Crazypaganii
Member
(3/26/06 11:23 am)
Reply Re: Thanks For The Memories
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Howie -
I'm unsure if a book review posted on either Amazon.com or Barnes and
Noble, something that is DESIGNED and CREATED to be read and used by
anyone, would be an EZBoard violation.
Can you please provide the link to this review? Thanks!
_________________________
kingunclehowie
Vet with a 'tude
(3/26/06 12:15 pm)
Reply Re: Thanks For The Memories
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
at ritas request the review was removed from barnes and noble; what
happened was that barnes and noble became another UNDIS where THEY just
posted their *** over and over again so between ritas request and
barnes and nobles being fed up with JANE and friends they removed it;
here is the main link to what i beleive robb the bad seed maker
created:
www.angelfire.com/blues/ririexposed/
_________________________
Crazypaganii
Member
(3/26/06 12:28 pm)
Reply Re: Thanks For The Memories
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IOW this was an incident where people, who didn't like someone, wrote
numerous fake "reviews" about that person's published book on Barnes
and Noble hoping to sway total strangers into not buying the book.
Their agenda appears to be interference with, and damage to, the
targetted author's livelihood. Is this the case? And this was done in
early 2002?
This couldn't be an example of how someone on the internet took their
internet battle into someone else's real life now, could it? That can't
be! They said they don't DO things like that! That they've NEVER done
things like that!
How interesting.
_________________________
kingunclehowie
Vet with a 'tude
(3/26/06 12:36 pm)
Reply Re: Thanks For The Memories
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
kinda looks that way, no?
_________________________
Crazypaganii
Member
(3/26/06 12:55 pm)
Reply Re: Thanks For The Memories
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So then I guess if the above posted book review (which, BTW, Barnes
and Noble co-owns the copyrights to) is squawked about by the person
who wrote it, or if it's removed by EZLegal at the request of the
person who wrote it*, then that would be an admission that this person
created the false review with malicious intent to intefere with, and
damage, a real live person's/author's livelihood.
So much for sweetness, innocence and not wishing harm on another human
being except for murderers, rapists, pedophiles and LL.
*VII. COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
Only the creator, authorized publisher, or an authorized agent of the
creator or authorized publisher of the original work may submit a valid
complaint of this type.
_________________________
kingunclehowie
Vet with a 'tude
(3/26/06 12:56 pm)
Reply Re: Thanks For The Memories
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
here is a link to the revews that are still there; notice the dates
and from whom - one from mr shiny himself lol:
search.barnesandnoble.com...4113&itm=2
i doubt any of them actually bought or read the book but they sure
tried to hurt her in the real world; but she can handle it - she is
loaded in real life - something many didnt know; her home was a
mansion; and her real name is not rita aero, that is only one of her
pen names, which is why those assholes could never touch her ;
_________________________
Crazypaganii
Member
(3/29/06 12:11 am)
Reply Re: Proven
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I see EZLegal has removed the book review. That means jane has
admitted to tampering with people's employment because of internet
battles. Only the person who WROTE the information can submit a valid
complaint that EZLegal will act on.
Accuse me of whatever you want - talk is cheap. But at least I NEVER
took it into the real world and interfered with people's real
livelihoods. I wonder who else at the UNDIS has messed with other
people's employment?
Saying on the internet that you hope someone dies is somehow worse than
messing with someone's income? Sorry. That's just not the way I see
it.
And I'm willing to bet that's not the way OTHER normal people see it,
either.
jane's not all 'sweetness and light' as she'd like others to think. And
this was done in 2002. You've been had, people. Open your eyes.
_________________________
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Disneyland Paris and California - do they have a slow season?
- Next by Date: Re: Disneyland Paris and California - do they have a slow season?
- Previous by thread: Re: undis
- Next by thread: Re: undis
- Index(es):