Re: Theories of lead and follow dancing
- From: "Ron N." <rhnlogic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 May 2006 17:28:06 -0700
Mike Corbett wrote:
On 1 May 2006 13:50:59 -0700, avid_dancer@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I do believe that Ron has brought out the most interesting
hypotheses in this thread.
The trouble with this thread is that you and Ron are hypothesizing
while Bob and I are making observations of fact. :-)
Exactly which well defined, testable, measurable, and independantly
verifiable specific facts have you stated in this thread?
The equipment currently doesn't exist to measure precise data
related to partner dancing.
You may think you know what you yourself are doing; but reports
from dancers (and even high level atheletes) about their actions
sometimes do not match what has been measured by video (and force
platforms, etc.)
IMHO. YMMV.
--
rhn A.T nicholson d.0.t C-o-M
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Theories of lead and follow dancing
- From: Bob Wheatley
- Re: Theories of lead and follow dancing
- From: Mike Corbett
- Re: Theories of lead and follow dancing
- References:
- Re: Brave New World
- From: Bob Wheatley
- Re: Brave New World
- From: avid_dancer
- Re: Brave New World
- From: Bob Wheatley
- Re: Brave New World
- From: avid_dancer
- Re: Brave New World
- From: Mike Corbett
- Re: Brave New World
- Prev by Date: Re: Theories of lead and follow dancing
- Next by Date: Re: Theories of lead and follow dancing
- Previous by thread: Re: Brave New World
- Next by thread: Re: Theories of lead and follow dancing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|