Re: OT: Political
- From: davkopp@xxxxxxx
- Date: 26 Oct 2005 00:18:49 -0700
John Wheaton wrote:
> <davkopp@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >
> > A very interesting story. So the whole Niger story was a French
> > fabrication which Blair and Bush fell for? If true, I'm not sure how
> > that helps the Bush Administration:-)
> >
>
> Because;
>
> 1) The Iraqi's DID try to buy Uranium as the Brits and others STILL atest to
> since they found WITNESSES to the attempt.
NONSENSE!!!! You have no idea what the British base their claim on
because they won't say. You choose to believe them. The CIA doesn't.
Every credible investigator has concluded the British claim is a crock.
>
> 2) The French generated the Forgeries KNOWing that when it became public
> knowledge that the documents were forged, many would discount the entire
> story, as has happened by you.
>
> The stories that Ed posted dealt ONLY with the forgeries, and in no way
> addressed the witnesses that the Brits have. You and Ed bit at the decoys
> that the French planted. The stories that I posted acknowledged the
> Forgeries, and specified that the forged documents were NEVER included, or
> in anyway we a factor in the Brits STILL standing behind the story that
> Saddam was trying to aquire additional Uranium from Niger.
>
> See ya,
> John
I didn't "bite" on anything, John. How absurd. I've read dozens of
articles on this subject from numerous credible sources. You're
ignoring so much evidence contrary to your view- overwhelming evidence
in fact- about not only the documents but the whole shadowy neocon web
of illegal contacts that led to this false story as well as other
neocon myths. I suggest you read this article:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0410.marshallrozen.html
And this one:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-102505leak_lat,0,7947383.story?coll=la-home-headlines
If you're looking for the REAL reason this Niger lie got into the
President's speech (and yes, it WAS a lie- I don't believe the Brits
any more than the CIA does), you could start with neocons Michael
Ledeen and Stephen Hadley and their rogue White House operation.
David Koppelman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Political
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT: Political
- References:
- Re: OT: Political
- From: Ed Jay
- Re: OT: Political
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT: Political
- From: davkopp
- Re: OT: Political
- From: Ed Jay
- Re: OT: Political
- From: davkopp
- Re: OT: Political
- From: Ed Jay
- Re: OT: Political
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT: Political
- From: Ed Jay
- Re: OT: Political
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT: Political
- From: davkopp
- Re: OT: Political
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT: Political
- Prev by Date: SoCal-WCS Wed Halloween Party w/Jumpin' Jack and Sonny
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Political
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Political
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Political
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading