Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: earl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 26 Aug 2005 01:28:09 -0700
Paul-Andre Panon wrote:
> Mike Corbett wrote:
>
> >
> > Nobody has explained to me how one supports the troops but not the
> > President. Maybe it CAN be done but. How? Explain.
P-A said it very well! I was just going add that supporting the troops
but not the President is very common in our history. Look whose quote
we are using, a republican not supporting Clinton in a time of war. For
me it is the same as being a huge Rams fan and thinking Mike Martz, the
head coach, is horrible. I love the team and I root for them but I
think Martz is a bad coach and the team would do better with out him.
However P-A said it much better.
>Mike this one is very telling! This false premise belongs to Bush so
>clearly you and Bush disagree. So who is right you or the President? If
>you are right than we were correct to enter Iraq without an exit
>strategy like we did, if the President is correct than he acted against
>is own premise. Thus he is either a liar or he is a hypocrite. Which is
>it?
An imprecise communicator. Where do you get from what I wrote that I
give a damn whether or not President Bush and I agree? Mikc Corbet
Mike, how is your reading comprehension coming? Bush's premise is very
precise and clear, "victory means exit strategy, and it's important for
the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." No this not
him being imprecise this him being either a hypocrite or a liar.
Actually that's not fair he could also be a fool.
"I didn't engage in a debate about the
Iraq war and have repeatedly indicated that choice to you.
No, thank you, Earl. Find somebody else to debate that subject with."
Mike Corbett
Mike, I don't blame you for not wanting to debate me on the Iraq war
because I will wipe the floor with you. Not because I am a better at
debate but because I have the better position. You don't have an issue
to stand upon that isn't full of holes and I think you are smart enough
to at least sense that. I wouldn't want to have to defend this war
either. However, if you should change your mind I'll give you odds: for
every positive result you can sustain about the invasion I will sustain
two negative results.
And just for giggles can you help me with my reading comprehension?
Please tell me what your quote below means?? What idea should the
reader take way from this zinger?
"What is not true is any sentence in the above that uses the word "no".
Substitute "enough" or some less absolute term and reasonable minds
could disagree"
Well said, clear as a bell. You should be a speech writer. Too much
fun. You were correct when you said, and I paraphrase, if I don't
understand what you are talking about now, I may never understand what
you are talking about.
Keep up the good work!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: Mike Corbett
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- References:
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: earl
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: Mike Corbett
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: earl
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: Mike Corbett
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: earl
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: Mike Corbett
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: earl
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: Mike Corbett
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: earl
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: Mike Corbett
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- From: Paul-Andre Panon
- Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- Prev by Date: Re: Rumor re Phoenix 7/4/06 - Say it ain't true, Joe.
- Next by Date: Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- Previous by thread: Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- Next by thread: Re: OT but damn they love to bomb
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|