Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:14:32 -0700
Mike Peterson wrote:
On Jun 6, 2:10 am, t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) wrote:
Just curious, but are you trying to make this happen at your paper,
or is it happening somewhere already?
Purely a reaction to the question.
Does that mean you aren't trying to make it happen at your paper? What, exactly, is the plan for your paper in these changing times?
jc
.
- References:
- Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- From: Mike Peterson
- Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- From: Ted Nolan <tednolan>
- Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- From: Mike Peterson
- Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- From: Ted Nolan <tednolan>
- Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- From: Mike Peterson
- Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- Prev by Date: Six Chix 6 June 2009
- Next by Date: Sheldon - 6 June 2009
- Previous by thread: Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- Next by thread: Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|