Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:07:08 -0700
PatONeill wrote:
On May 29, 2:36 am, JC Dill <jcdill.li...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:PatONeill wrote:I'm sorry, but I prefer my news to be done by people who know whatHere, read about bloggers who know what they are doing outing the
they're doing, not by a bunch of amateurs each contributing their bit.
"professional journalists" who phoned it in instead of researching the
story:
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1428
This is the type of story I find by following interesting blogs that I
would never find in the newspaper.
Oh, yeah, because it's so important
How is this any less important than the Donna Reed servicemen's letters story? And why does "importance" matter here? Wasn't your point that you wouldn't find stories like this if you just relied on blogs and not newspapers for your news?
that somebody catch a writer and
publisher in a marketing/publicity ploy that may not be completely
true. In the course of harping on the exactitude of "millionth word",
the bloggers miss the more important point the writer is making--that
English has become the world's language.
The writer has been scamming this "millionth word" thing for years.
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=972
The writer's point is to sell books, not to discuss if (or how) English has become the world's language. These traditional media journalists (except for the Economist) didn't do any research - they each wrote the article from a single source (the author). Isn't that shoddy journalism? Yet, the online journalist (Slate.com) got to the bottom of the story!
But now that you bring it up, why do you suppose English HAS become the world's language? Is it because of newspapers? Or is it because of the internet?
jc
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- From: PatONeill
- Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- Prev by Date: Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- Next by Date: Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- Previous by thread: Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- Next by thread: Re: Non Sequitur vs. LICD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading