Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- From: Dann <detox665@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Mar 2008 02:50:09 GMT
On 01 Mar 2008, sanford sklansky said the following in
news:XRmyj.11319$Ru4.7346@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dann" <detox665@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A54B4B8C8BB1detox665hotmailcom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 01 Mar 2008, Carl Fink said the following in
news:slrnfsjdb0.pdq.carlf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2008-03-01, Antonio E Gonzalez <AntEGM111@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah, look at the way the New Deal undermined th- . . . oh
right,
it actually ended the Great Depression . . .
In the sense of not actually ending the Depression. It surely made
it less horrible for the people at the very bottom, but World War
Two and the natural economic cycle ended it.
Much like as the current proposed economic policies [tax rebate
stimulus, lower interest rates, deficit spending] are ill-informed
economic interventions, the New Deal actually made matters worse by
forcing the Depression to last many years more than would have
otherwise been the case. I would also argue that the world war that
brought the world out of that economic depression more than natural
economic cycles.
Sure, the handouts helped people survive a 10 year depression, but
they might have found survival easier if it had only lasted the 1 to
3 years that was typical up until that point.
If you want to pinpoint the start of the depression from the day the
stock market crashed until Rooesevelt was inaugerated it was over 3
years already, so that puts it in to the 1 to 3 years you quote. By
the time Roosevelt took over the country was in pretty poor shape.
Absolutely correct. An accurate reading of history indicates that FDR
did nothing more than take the Hoover administration's harmful
initiatives and put them on steroids. It was the continuation of the
Hoover administation's bad ideas, coupled with FDR's substantially flawed
ideas about initiating a command ideas that caused the damage.
People where already out of work, there were lines for soup kitchens,
people had lost their homes and there were plenty of bank runs. That
is why after Roosevelt was inaugerated the banks were closed for a
short time. I think Roosevelt was just trying to do what ever he
could to get the economy going again.
That's a different critter. The banking and investment system needed
considerable overhaul/regulation/reform. FDR's administration
established an impressive framework for reform that has created ever
growing transparency in investments and banking.
Had FDR limited his administration's corrective actions to those reforms,
the depression would have ended years earlier.
--
Regards,
Dann
blogging at http://web.newsguy.com/dainbramage/blog.htm
Freedom works; each and every time it is tried.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- From: sanford sklansky
- Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- References:
- Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- From: Dann
- Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- From: Heather Fieldhouse
- Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- From: Dann
- Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- From: Paige
- Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- From: Pat O'Neill
- Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- From: Dann
- Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- From: Antonio E . Gonzalez
- Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- From: Carl Fink
- Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- From: Dann
- Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- From: sanford sklansky
- Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- Prev by Date: Re: New Funk Question
- Next by Date: Re: Art assists on Mary Worth?
- Previous by thread: Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- Next by thread: Re: Doonesbury Feb 2008 - last week
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|