Re: Doonesbury this week
- From: Mike Beede <beede@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 20:47:03 -0500
In article <1180057171.290653.236250@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
JGM <jgmclean0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 24, 9:03 pm, Tove Momerathsson <t...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They periodically change some of the Google groups (mailing lists)
code and always have a flagrant snafu that would have been picked
up by an alpha test and _should_ have been spotted and sent back
for repair before the alpha.
These people take no pride in their work.
I suspect that working on Groups is considered one step below
bathroom attendant at the big G.
That's too bad. It's a link Gogool has to the earlier history of
the web, before browsers and searching and things. I suppose
you're right, though, based on how effed up it seems to be. I
see that they've further hosed up searching, too. Some old stuff
seems to have vanished and now threads are harder to read.
Mike Beede
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Doonesbury this week
- From: Ted Goldblatt
- Re: Doonesbury this week
- References:
- Re: Doonesbury this week
- From: Jim Strain
- Re: Doonesbury this week
- From: Ted Nolan <tednolan>
- Re: Doonesbury this week
- From: Sherwood Harrington
- Re: Doonesbury this week
- From: Jim Strain
- Re: Doonesbury this week
- From: Mike Beede
- Re: Doonesbury this week
- From: Tove Momerathsson
- Re: Doonesbury this week
- From: JGM
- Re: Doonesbury this week
- Prev by Date: Re: Doonesbury this week
- Next by Date: How much does a newspaper pay for a comic strip?
- Previous by thread: Re: Doonesbury this week
- Next by thread: Re: Doonesbury this week
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading