Re: Edda's violent reaction in 9CWL
- From: "ameijers" <aemeijers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:53:41 GMT
"Mike Beede" <beede@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:beede-D8261F.08285016122005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <slrndq4g6h.ade.carlf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Carl Fink <carlf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 2005-12-16, Mike Beede <beede@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > What assault? I don't think that kicking near someone
> > > qualifies ...
> >
> > You are incorrect.
> >
> > Assault by definition is the *threat* of violence. Actually hurting
someone
> > is battery.
>
> Okay. Still kind of hard to prove, unless they had
> a web cam going. Thanks for the correction.
>
Proof for a conviction is one thing. A complaint is enough, these days, to
get someone questioned. (99 times out of a hundred, accused is male.) Burden
of proof for a PPO is much lower, from what I hear.
But thankfully, fair Edda and company live in a nicer place than we do,
where artistes are not subject to the rules of mere mortals.
aem sends...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Edda's violent reaction in 9CWL
- From: Mike Beede
- Re: Edda's violent reaction in 9CWL
- References:
- Edda's violent reaction in 9CWL
- From: Paul Ciszek
- Re: Edda's violent reaction in 9CWL
- From: Mike Beede
- Re: Edda's violent reaction in 9CWL
- From: Carl Fink
- Re: Edda's violent reaction in 9CWL
- From: Mike Beede
- Edda's violent reaction in 9CWL
- Prev by Date: Re: FBOW this week: 'Central Vacuuming'?
- Next by Date: CIDU Special Edition
- Previous by thread: Re: Edda's violent reaction in 9CWL
- Next by thread: Re: Edda's violent reaction in 9CWL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|