Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- From: Michael Kieras <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Nov 2005 13:08:02 -0400
hubcap <hubcap@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've worked with some editors who didn't care whether stuff
> was any good, funny or made a point. If it made people
> write angry letters, then that meant they were reading it,
> so let's run it. That made my bad stuff good, and my good stuff
> (OK, not-so-bad stuff) irrelevant.
> I think a lot of editorial cartoons are that way (not good, pointless
> and unfunny) but that gets them attention, and makes them successful.
Think of it as trolling, the early years. That probably means trolling
can be considered blog and podcast bloviating, the early years.
--
nn ,-==. '
(..) _`. ''
\/._>.__)''
.
- References:
- Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- From: Dann
- Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- From: Alexander D. Mitchell IV
- Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- From: hubcap
- Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- Prev by Date: Re: Why are second-tier comics so bad?
- Next by Date: Re: Why are second-tier comics so bad?
- Previous by thread: Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- Next by thread: Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
