Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- From: hubcap <hubcap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:44:42 +0000 (UTC)
I've worked with some editors who didn't care whether stuff
was any good, funny or made a point. If it made people
write angry letters, then that meant they were reading it,
so let's run it. That made my bad stuff good, and my good stuff
(OK, not-so-bad stuff) irrelevant.
I think a lot of editorial cartoons are that way (not good, pointless
and unfunny) but that gets them attention, and makes them successful.
-Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- From: Michael Kieras
- Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- References:
- Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- From: Dann
- Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- From: Alexander D. Mitchell IV
- Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- Prev by Date: Re: Candorville 11-29-2005
- Next by Date: Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- Previous by thread: Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- Next by thread: Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|