Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- From: ronniecat <ronniecat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:08:10 GMT
Recklessly refusing to invoke the Fifth Amendment, on 28 Nov 2005
19:54:08 -0400, Dann <detox665@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>http://www.ucomics.com/rallcom/2005/11/26/
I took this one to mean "We are creating a lot of fucked-up kids,
folks. And they are going to come back and live among us and they are
not going to be able to just put all that behind them and have normal
relationships". Presented, of course, with Rall's usual frothing
hyperbole.
I personally don't take that to be the fault of the fucked-up kids. In
fact, it can be interpreted as a plea to stop putting kids in
situations where they end up traumatized and messed up. (Say, giving
them orders to beat and/or torture prisioners, for example. Or
repeatedly putting them in situations where they find themselves
killing civilians.)
But if that was Rall's point, apparently nobody else got it.
ronnie
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- From: Sherwood Harrington
- Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- From: Dann
- Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- References:
- Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- From: Dann
- Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- Prev by Date: Re: Frazz IDU- November 29, 2005 (spoliers?)
- Next by Date: Re: Mallard Fillmore11-24: Crickets Chirping........
- Previous by thread: Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- Next by thread: Re: Ted Rall.....recently.....11/2005
- Index(es):