Re: New Avengers #13 -- Called it again, didn't I?

"Fallen" <fallen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:53Njf.8113$a15.2658@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jon J. Yeager wrote:
>
>>>You also seem to have misunderstood the phrase 'showing off'. There are
>>>online dictinaries available.
>>>
>>>I'll give you a hint, "I am like many others" won't be in the definition.
>>
>>Oh I agree, it won't. The problem is that "I am like many others" is
>>something you just wrote now to distance yourself from me, when Google
>>will testify that your actual original statements were more along the
>>lines of "Even though I called it, I still think it's stupid".
>>
> I did call it

103.

>... like many others. I am pleased that I called it, undoubtedly like many
>of the others who called it.
> I made no references to an imagined history of 'calling it' or implied
> that I was somehow special or alone in calling it. Therein lies the rather
> obvious difference.

You have no idea how this branch of the thread even started, do you? I
called the overnight silhouette change. You felt the need to ask me why I'm
boasting about that. I responded same reason you feel the need to remind us
over 100 times in the past week alone that you called Ronin = Echo.

So why are you still here whining like a bitch? Geez, man. I took you down 3
or 4 posts ago. You don't have a point anymore. This is just more trolling,
which is why you can't got 3 posts with anyone without it turning ugly. Or
haven't you been paying attention to how your threads have been turning out
lately? The embarrasing response to your gripes about The Other alone
(offered in two formats, neither of which interesting anyone) would wake
most people up to the fact that they've alienated most of the newsgroup. But
that kind of humility is always beyond your kind. Your kind just keeps
turning up the volume until people hate you so much that you have to take a
break for a few weeks and come back hoping people forgot what a mess of
things you made last time.

Ask Scott how that works.

> I understood your point, I just dismissed it as your usual and mocked you
> instead. It seemed more fun at the time.

Yeah, that tends to be what trolls fall back on when they've been -- what's
the term again? -- PWN3D.

You wear your name well. Now go back to calling Shawn and Scott idiots in
those other threads you're in. If you can't even handle /them/, then you're
just a joke, man.

Jon
--
"What's to keep both severed parts from
regenerating? While Wolverine's body
grows a new head, his head could grow a
new body. Could explain how he appears
in so many books every month."
- Josh Dull


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Can my class tell if one of its virtual members is overloaded?
    ... my newsreader doesn't show me the message that Jon is replying to here. ... Is that a problem in my newsreader or wasn't Tony's message posted to the group for some reason? ... calling a protected virtual member. ... there is no point to calling it if no derived classes ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: An alternative universe.
    ... Frankly...anyone calling themselves 'Queen of Heaven' can't be in the same ... universe as most others. ... Jon E. Szostak, Sr. ... business from the start...but they are the type who MUST CRITICIZE... ...
    (rec.music.opera)
  • Re: Casting
    ... When calling a virtual method you are always calling the method of the actual class. ... "Manish Bafna" wrote: ... "Jon" wrote: ... No matter what I do, ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Should this be a warning, at least?
    ... > With all due respect, Jon, it's not all that much the same issue. ... > Calling a method but not using its return value (or using an operator ... you just ignore the returned object ... "new"ing an object but not storing it anywhere is only very ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: In the public interest
    ... >> Jon~ ... > can't leave it alone can you. ... > nobody can say you weren't warned. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.local.southwest)