Re: Final Crisis - predictions?

On Jun 9, 10:07 pm, Marty <killhalag...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8 Jun, 19:41, Duggy <Paul.Dug...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://blog.case.edu/webdev/2007/11/08/googlereader.jpg
a front page/central point, Dugster.

If Google ceased to exist, usenet would still exist. Usenet has no
central point, unlike a board.

Something that exists on one site compared to something that doesn't.
What don't you get?
Your bizarre view of reality. You should write a book.
I'm sure a lot of people would find it interesting.

Yeah, keep up the over snipping. It's really, really helpful.

When did I say you said I was a troll? You sure like to put words in
people's mouths.
"Ad hom, eh? Can't defeat the argument, so you attack the person."
"If you really think I'm a troll the best thing is to stop feeding
me."

I asked if you think I'm a troll. I didn't say you said I was a
troll.

Caught out in yet enough lie.

You like to have a single view of things and anything outside that
view is wrong.
I have a view to something because I have deliberated at finding the
most logical conclusion to whatever it is.

Snort.

Sure Joker is in jail,
Jial? Don't you mean jail?
Childish.

I know you are, but what am I?

It did in Earth-2. Read it again.
I know what it said, but it just wasn't true.

It was clearly true in the GN. One of the reasons the GN sucked.

No. Imaginary extras should been worth as much in a reader's mind as
real people.
Of course it's correct. That's the way fiction works.
Not from my philisophical point of view.

Depends which philosopher.

I don't want to come across as entirely pc, but if comic writers did
deal with the devastation of the summer
crossover events in a more realistic way, we'd have a way more
interesting DCU.

Agreed.

Trees in prehistoric forests fell of millions of years without anyone
needing to know.
You don't know the specifics of a tree millions of years ago do you?

Specifics are none of some trees.

Besides this only proves my point. You need an observer, the
geologist, to confirm the existance of coal or oil or
fossil to suppose that vegetation *fell* here. Without the geologist
you don't know the hydrocarbon is even there.

Whether you know if the hydrocarbon is there, it's still there.

That nothing happens unless it is observed? No logic there at all.
Something may happen, but without an observer as far as we can tell,
it hasn't happened, because nobody can know it
has happened.

Yes, but it has happened.

Without this, who is there to say anything?

Who cares. It's only human arrogance that says things don't happen
unless they know about it.

Stars could be born and die in our universe, but as far as we are
concerned, it means nothing if there is no
consciousness to observe this and conclude something.

Meaning is meaningless. Whether we observe it or not, it happened if
it happened.

Either that or you're a moron.
Come now Duggy, no need to stoop to name calling. You can try harder
young man!

It's not name calling if it's tree.

I'm maintaining that pre and during COiE, the DCU was very probably
MWD.

CoIE says that there was a single universe that was split by Krona(?)
reaching to the end of time. That hardly fits the standard origin of
a MWD universe.

52verse = something else entirely.

He finally gets it.

I have not changed my standpoint on this *ever*. Please re-read thread
if you disagree somehow.

I have.

How odd, Mr Duggalopolis,

Wanker.

you've never had a problem with my snipping until this post. Why are you unable to follow
a conversation so suddenly?

Because suddenly large amounts of context are being snipped.

If you really think I'm a troll the best thing is to stop feeding me.
If not, have the discussion or not. It's up to you.
As I said quite a while ago "this debate does not look like it will
lead to a resolution, so the only logical
conclusion is to agree to disagree".

You've since started to agree with my points. So I can see an end
game here.

I am interested in finishing this debate. If you're not, you can
stop. But I'm not going to agree to disagree.

What you do is up to you.

End? I know I'm bored.

I'm not. I feel we're gettings somewhere Martiski.

===
= DUG.
===
.

Relevant Pages

  • Learning good manners from an expert
    ... Maybe usenet is not for you, ... should have offered that info about your neighbor's tree originally. ... ?I get mulch free at my local recycle center. ... Your reading comprehension skills are near the 3rd grade elementary ...
    (rec.gardens)
  • Re: Surprise! David fails to address the issue raised.
    ... is not an issue of communication but a difference in opinion. ... I disagree with lots of ... ANY kind of credibility in the public square. ... reassured) by the unwashed masses on Usenet. ...
    (soc.religion.quaker)
  • Re: [OT] Silly (copyright?) claim by "Galen".
    ... >> copy it everywhere that Usenet goes. ... > Again, I respectfully disagree, just as radio and TV broadcasts don't grant ... > restaurant providing the broadcast for customers still has to pay a license ... On Usenet the person making the post is requesting that it ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: OT: posting from Google Groups (was Re: Need help with perl script using threads.)
    ... regular webbrowser and usually the threads are in a tree on the left ... > Google is not Usenet, most people do NOT access Usenet via Google. ... > The guidelines did not "come first", the rules came first, then ... read previous posts. ...
    (comp.lang.perl.misc)
  • Re: What will stop all the OffTopic Spam?
    ... that leaves only my own postings to ... smart-ass in most of us. ... Why else would one post answers to dumb questions on Usenet? ... minor and often insignificant part of the topic, and disagree with ...
    (sci.electronics.repair)
Loading