Re: FINAL CRISIS #1: A Very Short Review

On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 17:37:38 -0700 (PDT), argento32
<aaronpynn32@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 8, 9:09 pm, "Scott" <moonhear...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They wouldn't have to keep doing the reboots if writers didn't keep letting
things from the old multiverse seep back in for nostalgia's sake.

"argento32" <aaronpyn...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:f6141633-3c30-4c28-bd22-972c5518abd4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To me COIE was the start of a downward spiral. Shoving everything in
one universe was a huge mistake. If it was such a great idea we
wouldn't have to keep having these damn reboots every few years. I
actually enjoyed the JSA/JLA cross-overs. I'd love to see it revert
back to the way it was originally.

Each crisis dealing with this keeps getting worse. And so far it looks
like Final Crisis is the worse.

Thats because they realize what a big mistake the one universe thing
was...

If that were true they would have undone it long before now...it's not
like they're stuck...and it would hardly be the first major event from
DC or Marvel that got reversed or ignored...I've read a lot of
pre-crisis DC and the stories that I thought were good were all ones
that had nothing to do with the multiverse...like the O'Neill/Adams
Batman and GL/GA stories...I like the idea of a traditional JSA/JLA
team-up but the dimension-hopping aspect always took me right out of
the story...I don't think they ever should have used the multiverse
approach at all but, if they had to, they could have at least put a
little effort into planning it so it wouldn't get so ridiculously
sloppy.
.

Quantcast