Re: 1st Mainstream Interracial Marriage & Child?
- From: "Michael Wood" <no-one@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:17:06 GMT
"Devlin Tay" <praxis18@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5qCdnVHWSP_T_HrYnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Again, I defy you to ask any number of lay person whether people ofEuropean
and Arabic descent are considered by them to be of the same race. You arelogic,
choosing to use "race" in the widest sense of the word. By your logic, a
Chinese and Japanese would be from the same "race" - in fact, by your
any number of Far Easterners (Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Thai, Vietnamese,Chinese-Japanese
Tibetan, Mongolian, etc) would be of the same "race" since we all pretty
much look the same and probably share a great deal of our genetics. Yet
clearly the lay Chinese or Japanese person would consider a
union, for example, to be an inter-racial one. Unless, of course, youtypically
happen to be of white European descent and just happen to have the
Western patronizing tendency to dismiss us all as "Asians".
Devlin Tay
Adelaide, Australia
Hey Devlin, you including all of us Aussies in the mix as being
Eastern/Asian or just your background?
Just curious. I'm very mixed myself - been called everything from Siberian
to Peruvian.
Michael Wood
.
- References:
- Re: 1st Mainstream Interracial Marriage & Child?
- From: Magnus, Robot Fighter.
- Re: 1st Mainstream Interracial Marriage & Child?
- From: Denny Colt
- Re: 1st Mainstream Interracial Marriage & Child?
- From: Devlin Tay
- Re: 1st Mainstream Interracial Marriage & Child?
- Prev by Date: Re: Olsen Nuttery (pardon a double post)
- Next by Date: Re: Can someone explain this shocking event in the latest 52?
- Previous by thread: Re: 1st Mainstream Interracial Marriage & Child?
- Next by thread: Re: 1st Mainstream Interracial Marriage & Child?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|