Re: Bring back Jim Corrigan
- From: Dan McEwen <ferroboy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Jan 2006 03:12:22 GMT
ad696@xxxxxx (Dwight Williams) wrote in
news:dqe3rs$sfo$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> Dan McEwen wrote:
>> John Duncan Yoyo <john-duncan-yoyo@xxxxxxx> wrote in
>> news:stgbs1pqi265hslslb34euget4hj8c23sq@xxxxxxx:
>>>On 12 Jan 2006 01:37:06 GMT, Dan McEwen <ferroboy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>"Dolphy" <Kyrpto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>>>>news:1136944919.866706.101010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>>>
>>>>>Ted Kord, maybe?
>>>>
>>>>I would hate that. Hal Jordan proved that the concept needs to
>>>>stand on its own. Give us someone new and let Blue Beetle rest in
>>>>peace. IMO, being host to the Spectre is a *punishment*.
>>>
>>>Actually it is a last chance for redemption.
>>
>> Does Ted Kord need redemption?
>
> I don't think so. He may need to settle up with Max (or "Max"?),
> but that bit of retribution has apparently been taken care of already.
Then there's a problem. If being the Spectre factors into being
redeemed, Ted doesn't fit. Jean Loring seems to fit better and I'd hate
her being the Spectre.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bring back Jim Corrigan
- From: Chris Pinard
- Re: Bring back Jim Corrigan
- References:
- Bring back Jim Corrigan
- From: blackjet76@xxxxxxx
- Re: Bring back Jim Corrigan
- From: Dan McEwen
- Re: Bring back Jim Corrigan
- From: Dolphy
- Re: Bring back Jim Corrigan
- From: Dan McEwen
- Re: Bring back Jim Corrigan
- From: John Duncan Yoyo
- Re: Bring back Jim Corrigan
- From: Dan McEwen
- Re: Bring back Jim Corrigan
- From: Dwight Williams
- Bring back Jim Corrigan
- Prev by Date: Re: Great group!
- Next by Date: Re: Great group! (All the drama)
- Previous by thread: Re: Bring back Jim Corrigan
- Next by thread: Re: Bring back Jim Corrigan
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|