Re: Here we go...
- From: "Curt James" <curtjames@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jul 2005 15:02:45 -0700
yttrstein@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Actually my heaviest was about 265lbs.
> From there I dropped to 186,
Your piddly /about/ 79 pounds lost is less
than 45 percent of 186 pounds lost. So I
still maintain that your position re surgery
for the purpose of losing weight is flimsy
at best.
> where I stayed for a number of years.
I didn't ask.
> I'm sorry
No doubt!
> curt, how much weight did you say
> you lost?
I haven't lost. I've never been fat. The most I've ever weighed was 180
pounds at a height of 6'1". And, yeah, that was the result of years of
weight training and force-feeding. Any of that sound familiar?
Do you read my posts?
| as for hanging out around here
| for any length of time, curt will
| have to be fucking gone first
Hnh.
I'm still here. You're still here. Maybe I misunderstood you. I guess
that's it.
> Is there a reason you feel that you
> can speak for fat people?
I'm not speaking for fat people. I'm speaking *against* blanket
statements. Your slogan, Fat Always Equals Slow, is incorrect.
--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Here we go...
- From: intergalactic snitty princess
- Re: Here we go...
- From: Judith Cookson
- Re: Here we go...
- References:
- Here we go...
- From: Jess Bragg
- Re: Here we go...
- From: yttrstein@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Here we go...
- From: Curt James
- Re: Here we go...
- From: Kate A. Pohjola
- Re: Here we go...
- From: yttrstein@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Here we go...
- From: Curt James
- Re: Here we go...
- From: yttrstein@xxxxxxxxx
- Here we go...
- Prev by Date: Re: Protecting fresh male nipple piercings from being jarred while sleeping
- Next by Date: Re: Here we go...
- Previous by thread: Re: Here we go...
- Next by thread: Re: Here we go...
- Index(es):