Re: [OT] Help converting h.264 files.
- From: Eric Schwartz <emschwar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:54:35 -0700
D B Malmquist <d.b.malmquist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> After much trial-and-erroring, I was able to re-encode a section of
> an h.264 MKV file (the fact that it was anamorphically stretched
> didn't make things easier) -- but the slow, stuttering video playback
> that bexame desynchronized with the audio GOT ENCODED INTO THE NEW
> FILE AS WELL.
Are you sure the original just wasn't poorly encoded? I don't have
any experience with h.264 per se, but my general rule of thumb is that
if two completely independent processes give the same (bad) result,
it's probably the source that's the problem.
> So I need a transcoder that doesn't depend upon real-time rendering
> of the video stream. Does such a thing exist, or do all tools for
> re-encoding video only work if the CPU is not max'ed out?
As far as I can tell, mencoder doesn't do any real-time anything,
given that it works in multiple passes as a rule, even by the
(probably intentionally) lax definition of "real-time" you're using.
Are you sure the source is good?
-=Eric
.
- References:
- [OT] Help converting h.264 files.
- From: D B Malmquist
- Re: [OT] Help converting h.264 files.
- From: D B Malmquist
- [OT] Help converting h.264 files.
- Prev by Date: Re: Help converting h.264 files.
- Next by Date: Re: Help converting h.264 files.
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Help converting h.264 files.
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Help converting h.264 files.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
