Re: Google removing anonymity and privacy?
- From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:10:31 -0400
In <kf7Vp.18251$g12.8937@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 07/18/2011
at 11:55 PM, MartinS <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
Didn't it require 3 passes to do an alphabetic sort? (Memory is
hazy.)
Two per column should be adequate, but sequence numbers were normally
numeric.
Then there were the chain printers and gang punchers.
The 1401 displaced the other tinkertoys early on.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Re: Google removing anonymity and privacy?
- From: Jeßus
- Re: Google removing anonymity and privacy?
- From: Mike Yetto
- Re: Google removing anonymity and privacy?
- From: Stephen Wolstenholme
- Re: Google removing anonymity and privacy?
- From: Mike Yetto
- Re: Google removing anonymity and privacy?
- From: Gene E. Bloch
- Re: Google removing anonymity and privacy?
- From: MartinS
- Re: Google removing anonymity and privacy?
- From: Gene E. Bloch
- Re: Google removing anonymity and privacy?
- From: MartinS
- Re: Google removing anonymity and privacy?
- Prev by Date: X-News How To?
- Next by Date: Re: basic XNews how-to's
- Previous by thread: Re: Google removing anonymity and privacy?
- Next by thread: Re: Google removing anonymity and privacy?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|