Re: new to usenet, some slrn questions
- From: TomB <tommy.bongaerts@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Apr 2009 20:32:29 GMT
On 2009-04-28, Gene E. Bloch was urged to write the following:
On 28 Apr 2009 17:57:30 GMT, TomB wrote:
That's why I try to leave most settings of the applications I use as
close to the defaults as possible. Most applications I use have pretty
sensible defaults anyway...
Yep! The above tale was one of my milestones in (all too) slowly learning
to do as you said. I still have a ways to go :-)
I have to admid that being a lazy fsck helps a lot in maintaining this
philosophy ;-)
--
We should start referring to processes which run in the background by
their correct technical name... paenguins.
~ Kevin M. Bealer
.
- References:
- new to usenet, some slrn questions
- From: Steven DuBois
- Re: new to usenet, some slrn questions
- From: TomB
- Re: new to usenet, some slrn questions
- From: Steven DuBois
- Re: new to usenet, some slrn questions
- From: andrew
- Re: new to usenet, some slrn questions
- From: Indi
- Re: new to usenet, some slrn questions
- From: Justin C
- Re: new to usenet, some slrn questions
- From: Indi
- Re: new to usenet, some slrn questions
- From: Steven DuBois
- Re: new to usenet, some slrn questions
- From: andrew
- Re: new to usenet, some slrn questions
- From: Chris P. Bacon
- new to usenet, some slrn questions
- Prev by Date: Re: [JR] X.EXE is broken
- Next by Date: Re: OT - Regarding the maniacle Trojan spreader on usenetserver
- Previous by thread: Re: new to usenet, some slrn questions
- Next by thread: Re: new to usenet, some slrn questions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|