Re: XNA redux
- From: "Mike Easter" <MikeE@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:46:05 -0700
Mike Easter wrote:
OK, here's the way I see it so far.
It seems reasonable to ask an XNAer what is the main 'reason' or</mycite>
intent s/he chooses to do so
It seems 'reasonable' to ask an XNAer what is the main 'reason' or
intent s/he *chooses* to do so? Over and over and over again?
Actually, the only xna/er Steve Ackman who has participated in this
discussion has provided almost no justification or explanation or
elaboration on his reasons for doing so in spite of repetitive
opportunities and challenges to explain himself.
At the beginning those challenges were merely offensive ad hominem attacks
which didn't deserve response. Since then, the opportunity has been
neglected or dodged, depending on one's vernacular.
It seems 'reasonable' to ask a non-XNAer what is the main 'reason' or
intent s/he *chooses* [not] to do so?
If that is a/your question, then the answer is 'No'.