Re: XNA redux

XS11E wrote:
"Mike Easter"

If you believe that xna is a dull subject then you also agree that
xna-ing is just fine if that's what someone wants to do, as
opposed to others here who disagree with you.

That might just be the biggest logical fallacy I've seen on usenet?

Which part is the fallacy?

If your 'position' on xna is unspoken or unexplained, then one is left to
'derive' it based on your expressed 'dullness' opinion.

Perhaps the most common opinion might be that xna-ing is just fine if
that's what someone wants to do. Do you hold some other?


--
Mike Easter

.